The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of emotion in pain modulation.
Abstract
Although most agree that emotion can alter pain, little well-controlled research has been conducted to examine this issue. The present review provides psychological and physiological rationales for considering the influence of emotion on pain, followed by an overview of recent work in this area. We conclude that the pain-modulating effects of emotion are best characterized by an interaction between valence and arousal. Positive emotions lead to pain reduction as long as a minimal threshold of arousal is attained. However, negative emotions only lead to pain inhibition when they are highly arousing. Negative emotions coupled with low-to-moderate arousal facilitate pain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to the biosocial model[12; 13], validation has a soothing effect, reduces negative affect, and “takes the steam” out of interactions with high emotional arousal.[6]”
From Validating pain communication: current state of the science (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“In the developing the construct of validation, Linehan describes six levels of validating behaviors that individuals (e.g. partners, friends, health professionals) may engage in (see Table 1).”
From Validating pain communication: current state of the science (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“According to the biosocial model, if patients receive validation after sharing pain-related thoughts and feelings, they will feel understood and accepted, will experience a reductions in emotional arousal and negative affect, and may experience a reduction in pain (see Figure 1, Panel B).”
From Validating pain communication: current state of the science (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
Pain mechanisms: a new theory.
Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3699.971 · Cited by 11,108
LeDoux, J. E. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155 · Cited by 8,444
Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art.
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Linton, S. J. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00242-0 · Cited by 4,931
The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention.
Lang, P. J. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.50.5.372 · Cited by 2,876
Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain
Price, D. D. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5472.1769 · Cited by 2,092
Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00044-7 · Cited by 1,900
The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style
Davidson, R. J., & Irwin, W. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01265-0 · Cited by 1,684
Neurobehavioural mechanisms of reward and motivation
Robbins, T. W., & Everitt, B. J. (1996) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(96)80077-8 · Cited by 1,187
Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2000) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720204 · Cited by 966
Reward processing in primate orbitofrontal cortex and basal ganglia
Schultz, W. (2000) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/10.3.272 · Cited by 942
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Meagher, 1999, Soc Neurosci Abs, 25, 688
- Meagher, 2000, Soc Neurosci Abs, 26, 653
- Lang, 1995, Am Psychol, 50, 372, 10.1037/0003-066X.50.5.372 · DOI
- Villanueva, 1995, Pain, 28, 113
- Rhudy, 1999, Soc Neurosci Abs, 25, 144
- Rhudy, 2000, Soc Neurosci Abs, 26, 84
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neugebauer, V., Galhardo, V., Maione, S., & Mackey, S. (2009) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.014 · Cited by 369
Prestimulus functional connectivity determines pain perception in humans
Ploner, M., Lee, M., Wiech, K., Bingel, U., & Tracey, I. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0906186106 · Cited by 311
Affective modulation of nociception at spinal and supraspinal levels
Rhudy, J. L., Williams, A. E., McCabe, K. M., Nguyê˜n, M. A. T. V., & Rambo, P. (2005) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00313.x · Cited by 218
Self-citationHemispheric Lateralization of Pain Processing by Amygdala Neurons
Ji, G., & Neugebauer, V. (2009) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00166.2009 · Cited by 214
Psychological Risk Factors in Headache
Nicholson, R. A., Houle, T. T., Rhudy, J. L., & Norton, P. J. (2007) · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00716.x · Cited by 203
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rhudy, J. L., & Meagher, M. W.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Meagher, Mary W.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Psychiatry
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-245
- ISSN
- 0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2329382998
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- emotions, pain modulation, pain inhibition, pain facilitation, valence, arousal, positive emotions, negative emotions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
