Cited by 218Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Placebo EffectPain Management and Treatment

Affective modulation of nociception at spinal and supraspinal levels

Rhudy, Jamie L., Williams, Amy E., McCabe, Klanci M., Nguyê˜n, Mary Anh Thù V., Rambo, Philip·2005·Psychophysiology

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the effect of emotion on the nociceptive flexion reflex and pain ratings. To do so, 28 participants viewed pictures varying in emotional valence (unpleasant, neutral, pleasant) and electric stimulations were delivered during and in between pictures. Biceps femoris EMG resulting from the stimulations was used to quantify the nociceptive flexion reflex (spinal nociception), and pain ratings to the stimulations were used as an evaluative measure of supraspinal nociception. Manipulation checks suggested that pictures effectively manipulated emotion. Moreover, nociceptive flexion reflex magnitudes and pain ratings were modulated in a parallel manner. Specifically, viewing unpleasant pictures enhanced the nociceptive flexion reflex and pain, whereas viewing pleasant pictures inhibited the reflex and pain. Analyses suggested that emotional valence, but not arousal, mediated the effects of pictures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00313.x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In randomized controlled trials, individuals with high pre-treatment catastrophizing benefited less from topical analgesics, oral analgesics, and psychosocial treatments.

    “In randomized controlled trials, individuals with high pretreatment levels of catastrophizing demonstrated less benefit from topical analgesics 313, oral analgesics 309, and psychosocial treatments314, 315.”
  • Catastrophizing affects the effectiveness of pain-relieving interventions, including surgery.

    “Catastrophizing also impacts treatment effectiveness for pain-relieving interventions 300, 301, 309, including surgery310–312.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhudy, J. L., Williams, A. E., McCabe, K. M., Nguyê˜n, M. A. T. V., & Rambo, P.
Affiliations
University of Tulsa (US)
Corresponding author
Rhudy, Jamie L.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-26
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
579-587
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2102650300
Cited by
218
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pain and emotion, nociceptive flexion reflex, spinal nociception, pain scores, emotional valence, unpleasant pictures, emotional arousal
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Arousal, Brain, Electric Stimulation, Electromyography, Escape Reaction, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Motivation, Neural Inhibition, Reflex, Spinal Cord, Statistics as Topic, Pain Threshold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review