The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Relationship Between Stress Shielding and Bone Resorption Around Total Hip Stems and the Effects of Flexible Materials
Open accessAbstract
Bone resorption around hip stems is a disturbing phenomenon, although its clinical significance and its eventual effects on replacement longevity are as yet uncertain. The relationship between implant flexibility and the extent of bone loss, frequently established in clinical patient series and animal experiments, does suggest that the changes in bone morphology are an effect of stress shielding and a subsequent adaptive remodeling process. This relationship was investigated using strain-adaptive bone-remodeling theory in combination with finite element models to simulate the bone remodeling process. The effects of stem material flexibility, bone flexibility, and bone reactivity on the process and its eventual outcome were studied. Stem flexibility was also related to proximal implant/bone interface stresses. The results sustain the hypothesis that the resorptive processes are an effect of bone adaptation to stress shielding. The effects of stem flexibility are confirmed by the simulation analysis. It was also established that individual differences in bone reactivity and mechanical bone quality (density and stiffness) may account for the individual variations found in patients and animal experiments. Flexible stems reduce stress shielding and bone resorption. However, they increase proximal interface stresses. Hence, the cure against bone resorption they represent may develop into increased loosening rates because of interface debonding and micromotion. The methods presented in this paper can be used to establish optimal stem-design characteristics or check the adequacy of designs in preclinical testing procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants
Kurtz, S. M., & Devine, J. N. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 · Cited by 2,388
Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: a review
Ramakrishna, S., Mayer, J., Wintermantel, E., & Leong, K. W. (2001) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0266-3538(00)00241-4 · Cited by 1,642
Review on titanium and titanium based alloys as biomaterials for orthopaedic applications
Kaur, M., & Singh, K. (2019) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.064 · Cited by 1,451
Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Alloys by Electron Beam Melting: A Review
Zhang, L., Liu, Y., Li, S., & Hao, Y. (2018) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.201700842 · Cited by 486
Helton, K. L., Ratner, B. D., & Wisniewski, N. A. (2011) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681100500317 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- HUISKES, R., WEINANS, H., & RIETBERGEN, B. V.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 274
- Issue
- 274
- Pages
- 124???134
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128690996
- Cited by
- 1,213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationship Between Stress Shielding and Bone Resorption Around Total Hip Stems and the Effects of Flexible Materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003086-199201000-00014
- The paper
- HUISKES, R., WEINANS, H., & RIETBERGEN, B. V. (1992). The Relationship Between Stress Shielding and Bone Resorption Around Total Hip Stems and the Effects of Flexible Materials. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199201000-00014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.