The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Cell and Molecular Biology of Fracture Healing
Abstract
Fracture healing is a complex physiologic process that involves the coordinated participation of several cell types. By using a reproducible model of experimental fracture healing in the rat, it is possible to elucidate the integrated cellular responses that signal the pathways and the role of the extracellular matrix components in orchestrating the events of fracture healing. Histologic characterization of fracture healing shows that intramembranous ossification occurs under the periosteum within a few days after an injury. Events of endochondral ossification occur adjacent to the fracture site and span a period of up to 28 days. Remodeling of the woven bone formed by intramembranous and endochondral ossification proceeds for several weeks. Spatial and temporal expression of genes for major collagens (Types I and II), minor fibrillar collagens (Types IV and XI), and several extracellular matrix components (osteocalcin, osteonectin, osteopontin, fibronectin and CD44) are detected by in situ hybridization. Immunohistochemical studies show that expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen is both time and space dependent and differentially expressed in the callus tissues formed by the intramembranous and endochondral processes. Chondrocytes involved in endochondral ossification undergo apoptosis (programmed cell death), and early events in fracture healing may be initiated by the expression of early response genes such as c-fos. Additional characterization and elucidation of fracture healing will lay the foundation for subsequent studies aimed at identifying mechanisms for enhancing skeletal repair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collagen fibrillogenesis in vitro: interaction of types I and V collagen regulates fibril diameter
Birk, D. E., Fitch, J. M., Babiarz, J. P., Doane, K. J., & Linsenmayer, T. F. (1990) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.95.4.649 · Cited by 596
Cited by
The biology of fracture healing
Marsell, R., & Einhorn, T. A. (2011) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031 · Cited by 1,824
Self-citationCarano, R. A. D., & Filvaroff, E. H. (2003) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(03)02866-6 · Cited by 746
Zhang, X., Chen, X., Hong, H., Hu, R., Liu, J., & Liu, C. (2022) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.014 · Cited by 680
Kon, T., Cho, T.-J., Aizawa, T., Yamazaki, M., Nooh, N., Graves, D., Gerstenfeld, L. C., & Einhorn, T. A. (2001) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.6.1004 · Cited by 552
Self-citationOsteoimmunology: The conceptual framework unifying the immune and skeletal systems
Okamoto, K., Nakashima, T., Shinohara, M., Negishi-Koga, T., Komatsu, N., Terashima, A., Sawa, S., Nitta, T., & Takayanagi, H. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00036.2016 · Cited by 534
Metadata
- Authors
- Einhorn, T. A.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 355S
- Issue
- 355 Suppl
- Pages
- S7-S21
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987504060
- Cited by
- 1,278
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Cell and Molecular Biology of Fracture Healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003086-199810001-00003
- The paper
- Einhorn, T. A. (1998). The Cell and Molecular Biology of Fracture Healing. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199810001-00003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.