The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strain Rate and Timing of Stimulation in Mechanical Modulation of Fracture Healing
Abstract
Fracture of the long bones results in a repair process that has the potential to restore the anatomic morphology and mechanical integrity of the bone without scar tissue. The repair process can occur in two patterns. In the first, under conditions of rigid stabilization, direct osteonal remodeling of the fracture line can occur with little or no external callus, a process known as direct bone repair. The second pattern of repair involves bridging of the fragments with external callus and formation of bone in the fracture site by endochondral healing. This type of repair is known as indirect bone healing and occurs under less rigid interfragmentary stabilization. The rate of healing and the extent of callus in this type of repair can be modulated by the mechanical conditions at the fracture site. Applying cyclic interfragmentary micromotion for short periods has been shown to influence the repair process significantly, and characteristics of this stimulus influence the healing response observed. In the current study, a short term interfragmentary cyclic micromovement applied at a high strain rate induced a greater amount of periosteal callus than the same stimulus applied at a low strain rate. This high strain rate stimulus applied later in the healing period significantly inhibited the progress of healing. The beneficial effect of this particular biophysic stimulus early in the healing period may be related to the viscoelastic nature of the differentiating connective tissues in the early endochondral callus. In the early endochondral callus, high rates of movement induce a greater deformation of the fracture fragments because of the stiffening of the callus. Alternatively, the transduction pathway may involve streaming potentials as a result of the high movement rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlled mechanical stimulation in the treatment of tibial fractures
KENWRIGHT, J., & GOODSHIP, A. E. (1989) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-198904000-00006 · Cited by 373
Self-citation
Cited by
Biomechanical testing of the LCP – how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?
Stoffel, K., Dieter, U., Stachowiak, G., Gächter, A., & Kuster, M. S. (2003) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.021 · Cited by 657
Bone fracture healing in mechanobiological modeling: A review of principles and methods
Ghiasi, M. S., Chen, J., Vaziri, A., Rodriguez, E. K., & Nazarian, A. (2017) · Bone Reports · doi:10.1016/j.bonr.2017.03.002 · Cited by 485
Tibio‐femoral loading during human gait and stair climbing
Taylor, W. R., Heller, M. O., Bergmann, G., & Duda, G. N. (2004) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1016/j.orthres.2003.09.003 · Cited by 366
Claes, L., Blakytny, R., Besse, J., Bausewein, C., Ignatius, A., & Willie, B. (2011) · Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma · doi:10.1097/bot.0b013e3181e3d994 · Cited by 75
Barcik, J., & Epari, D. R. (2021) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines9060691 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodship, A. E., Cunningham, J. L., & Kenwright, J.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 355S
- Issue
- 355 Suppl
- Pages
- S105-S115
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085481239
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strain Rate and Timing of Stimulation in Mechanical Modulation of Fracture Healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003086-199810001-00012
- The paper
- Goodship, A. E., Cunningham, J. L., & Kenwright, J. (1998). Strain Rate and Timing of Stimulation in Mechanical Modulation of Fracture Healing. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199810001-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.