The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of patient care
Abstract
A Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS) is presented to allow quantitative comparison of patient care and research experiences of different intensive care units. 57 items of therapeutic intervention are scored on a one to four basis according to intensity of involvement. The points acquired per patient per 24 hours are summated by an experienced observer. TISS has been used to: 1) determine appropriate utilization of intensive care facilities at the Massachusetts General Hospital; 2) provide information on nurse staffing ratios for various patient care areas; 3) quantitatively validate a clinical classification of critically ill patients into four categories, thereby simplifying and organizing activities relating to patient care; 4) analyze cost of intensive care relative to the extent of care offered. Assumptions inherent in formulating this system are discussed. If other intensivists incorporate this system into their experience, meaningful comparisons between intensive care units can occur.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.
Van den Berghe, G., Wouters, P., Weekers, F., Verwaest, C., Bruyninckx, F., Schetz, M., Vlasselaers, D., Ferdinande, P., Lauwers, P., & Bouillon, R. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011300 · Cited by 9,977
Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU
Van den Berghe, G., Wilmer, A., Hermans, G., Meersseman, W., Wouters, P. J., Milants, I., Van Wijngaerden, E., Bobbaers, H., & Bouillon, R. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa052521 · Cited by 3,639
Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill
Vincent, J.-L., & Moreno, R. (2010) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc8204 · Cited by 634
DOIG, C. J., SUTHERLAND, L. R., DEAN SANDHAM, J., FICK, G. H., VERHOEF, M., & MEDDINGS, J. B. (1998) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.158.2.9710092 · Cited by 411
Mayer‐Oakes, S. A., Oye, R. K., & Leake, B. (1991) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb04452.x · Cited by 123
Phase Angle as a Prognostic Marker in Patients With Critical Illness
da Silva, T. K., Berbigier, M. C., Rubin, B. D. A., Moraes, R. B., Corrêa Souza, G., & Schweigert Perry, I. D. (2015) · Nutrition in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1177/0884533615572150 · Cited by 82
The association of nicotine replacement therapy with mortality in a medical intensive care unit
Lee, A. H., & Afessa, B. (2007) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000266537.86437.38 · Cited by 64
Pollack, A. H., & Pratt, W. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19301 · Cited by 53
Peeters, R. P., Hagendorf, A., Vanhorebeek, I., Visser, T. J., Klootwijk, W., Mesotten, D., Wouters, P. J., Koper, J. W., De Jong, F. H., Feelders, R. A., et al. (2009) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03443.x · Cited by 36
Chen, Y.-Y., Su, M., Huang, S.-C., Chu, T.-S., Lin, M.-T., Chiu, Y.-C., & Lin, K.-H. (2019) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-019-0429-z · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- CULLEN, D. J., CIVETTA, J. M., BRIGGS, B. A., & FERRARA, L. C.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 1974-03
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 57-60
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003378032
- Cited by
- 1,200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
