Comparison of noninvasive blood pressure monitoring with invasive arterial pressure monitoring in medical ICU patients with septic shock
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In the critically ill, the insertion of peripheral arterial catheters to monitor hemodynamics is a low-risk procedure, but carries the potential for complications. This study was designed to compare invasive and noninvasive blood pressure measurements in patients with septic shock in a medical ICU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a prospective observational study of patients admitted with septic shock and a radially inserted peripheral arterial catheter in the medical ICU with 31 adult patients who underwent four pairs of simultaneous noninvasive and invasive blood pressure measurements (124 comparisons), with the invasive blood pressure taken as the gold standard. Agreements between invasive and noninvasive blood pressure methods were assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, and clinical significance was determined by the European Society of Hypertension criteria. RESULTS: In all patients, noninvasive systolic (P=0.0385), diastolic (P<0.0001), and mean arterial pressures (P<0.0001) did correlate statistically with invasive measurements; however, all noninvasive pressure measurements did not correlate clinically according to the European Society of Hypertension criteria. CONCLUSION: In our patients admitted to the medical ICU with septic shock, noninvasive blood pressure monitoring did not clinically correlate with invasive blood pressure measurements.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-invasive cuff blood pressure estimation tends to be inaccurate, with discrepancy more pronounced in shock states.
“Estimation of blood pressure using a non-invasive cuff tends to be inaccurate and the discrepancy more pronounced in shock states [375–379].”
From Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [379]
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965 · see citing works
Beckett, A. H., Rowland, M., & TURNER, P. (1965) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(65)91037-8 · Cited by 16,917 · see citing works
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Douglas, I. S., Jaeschke, R., et al. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af · Cited by 9,694 · see citing works
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/096228029900800204 · Cited by 9,619 · see citing works
Understanding bland altman analysis
Giavarina, D. (2015) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2015.015 · Cited by 4,022 · see citing works
Scheer, B., Perel, A., & Pfeiffer, U. J. (2002) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc1489 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
O'Brien, E. T., Atkins, N., Stergiou, G. S., Karpettas, N., Parati, G., Asmar, R. G., Imai, Y., Wang, J., Mengden, T., & Shennan, A. H. (2010) · Blood Pressure Monitoring · doi:10.1097/mbp.0b013e3283360e98 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement in the ICU*
Lehman, L.-W. H., Saeed, M., Talmor, D., Mark, R., & Malhotra, A. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e318265ea46 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Bur, A., Hirschl, M. M., Herkner, H., Oschatz, E., Kofler, J., Woisetschläger, C., & Laggner, A. N. (2000) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-200002000-00014 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Variation of Arterial and Central Venous Catheter Use in United States Intensive Care Units
Gershengorn, H. B., Garland, A., Kramer, A. A., Scales, D. C., Rubenfeld, G. D., & Wunsch, H. (2013) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000000008 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Arterial blood pressure monitoring in overweight critically ill patients: invasive or noninvasive?
Araghi, A., Bander, J. J., & Guzman, J. A. (2006) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc4896 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Noninvasive monitoring of blood pressure in the critically ill
Lakhal, K., Macq, C., Ehrmann, S., Boulain, T., & Capdevila, X. (2012) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31823dae42 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Ribezzo, S., Spina, E., Bartolomeo, S. D., & Sanson, G. (2014) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1155/2014/353628 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Garland, A., & Connors, A. F. (2010) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201003-0410ed · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Equivalence of fast flush and square wave testing of blood pressure monitoring systems
Kleinman, B., Powell, S., & Gardner, R. M. (1996) · The Journal of Clinical Monitoring · doi:10.1007/bf02078135 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Arterial catheters are not risk-free spigots*
Mermel, L. A. (2008) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181629898 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Modalities of Invasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients
Jacq, G., Gritti, K., Carré, C., et al. (2015) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000001557 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.
Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C. M., French, C., Machado, F. R., Mcintyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H. C., et al. (2021) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000005337 · Cited by 2,935 · see citing works
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021
Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C. M., French, C., Machado, F. R., Mcintyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H. C., et al. (2021) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y · Cited by 5,082 · see citing works
Surviving Sepsis campaign: international guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2026
Prescott, H. C., Antonelli, M., Alhazzani, W., Møller, M. H., Alshamsi, F., Azevedo, L. C. P., Belley-Cote, E., De Waele, J., Derde, L., Dionne, J. C., et al. (2026) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000007075 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
- Authors
- Riley, L. E., Chen, G. J., & Latham, H. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Riley, Leonard E.
- ORCID
- Riley, Leonard E.
- Venue
- Blood Pressure Monitoring
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 202-207
- ISSN
- 1359-5237 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2604209262
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Blood Pressure Monitoring (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Keywords
- non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, invasive arterial pressure monitoring, septic shock, peripheral arterial catheters, medical intensive care unit, hemodynamic monitoring, mean arterial pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, measurement agreement
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Catheterization, Critical Care, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Shock, Septic, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review