The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aquaporins in Brain: Distribution, Physiology, and Pathophysiology
Open accessAbstract
Water homeostasis in the brain is of central physiologic and clinical importance. Neuronal activity and ion water homeostasis are inextricably coupled. For example, the clearance of K+ from areas of high neuronal activity is associated with a concomitant water flux. Furthermore, cerebral edema, a final common pathway of numerous neurologic diseases, including stroke, may rapidly become life threatening because of the rigid encasement of the brain. A water channel family, the aquaporins, facilitates water flux through the plasma membrane of many cell types. In rodent brain, several recent studies have demonstrated the presence of different types of aquaporins. Aquaporin 1 (AQP1) was detected on epithelial cells in the choroid plexus whereas AQP4, AQP5 and AQP9 were localized on astrocytes and ependymal cells. In rodent brain, AQP4 is present on astrocytic end-feet in contact with brain vessels, and AQP9 is found on astrocytic processes and cell bodies. In basal physiologic conditions, AQP4 and AQP9 appear to be implicated in brain homeostasis and in central plasma osmolarity regulation. Aquaporin 4 may also play a role in pathophysiologic conditions, as shown by the reduced edema formation observed after water intoxication and focal cerebral ischemia in AQP4-knockout mice. Furthermore, pathophysiologic conditions may modulate AQP4 and AQP9 expression. For example, AQP4 and AQP9 were shown to be upregulated after ischemia or after traumatic injuries. Taken together, these recent reports suggest that water homeostasis in the brain is maintained by regulatory processes that, by control of aquaporin expression and distribution, induce and organize water movements. Facilitation of these movements may contribute to the development of edema formation after acute cerebral insults such as ischemia or traumatic injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Imaging cell volume changes and neuronal excitation in the hippocampal slice
Andrew, R. D., & Macvicar, B. A. (1994) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(94)90372-7 · Cited by 304
Cited by
Unterberg, A. W., Stover, J., Kress, B., & Kiening, K. L. (2004) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.06.046 · Cited by 881
A new look at cerebrospinal fluid circulation
Brinker, T., Stopa, E., Morrison, J., & Klinge, P. (2014) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/2045-8118-11-10 · Cited by 819
The role of brain barriers in fluid movement in the CNS: is there a ‘glymphatic’ system?
Abbott, N. J., Pizzo, M. E., Preston, J. E., Janigro, D., & Thorne, R. G. (2018) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-018-1812-4 · Cited by 593
Pathophysiology and therapy of experimental stroke
Hossmann, K.-A. (2006) · Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s10571-006-9008-1 · Cited by 475
Brain endothelial cells and the glio-vascular complex
Wolburg, H., Noell, S., Mack, A., Wolburg-Buchholz, K., & Fallier-Becker, P. (2009) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-008-0658-9 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Badaut, J., Lasbennes, F., Magistretti, P. J., & Regli, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 367-378
- ISSN
- 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-7016
- OpenAlex
- W2001613505
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.