Cited by 87Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Measuring Inhibitory Control in Children

PLISZKA, STEVEN R., BORCHERDING, STEVE H., SPRATLEY, KRIS, LEON, STAGEY, IRICK, SHIELA·1997·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

The Stop Signal Task is a measure of inhibitory control in which subjects must press a button in response to a stimulus. On certain trials, the subject receives a second stimulus (the Stop Signal) after the primary stimulus and must withhold his/her response during those trials. The onset of the Stop Signal is varied, sometimes coming immediately after the primary stimulus (inhibition is easy); at other times, the Stop Signal arrives quite late, making inhibition difficult. Results from the Stop Signal Task were obtained from children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and from controls; children with ADHD had significantly more difficulty inhibiting their responses than did controls. In a second study, results from the Stop Signal Task were obtained from a large sample of both behaviorally disturbed and community children; variables from the Stop Signal Task correlated well with both laboratory observations and teacher ratings of inattention and hyperactivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004703-199708000-00005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The inhibition task seemed to be much easier for control children without ADHD compared to children with ADHD.

    “Indeed, the inhibition task seemed to be much easier for control children without ADHD as compared to children with ADHD (Pliszka et al., 1997), as the former showed an inhibition performance of close to 90% even without the formation of implementation intentions (the respective performance level of children with ADHD was a mere 78%).”

    From Implementation Intentions Facilitate Response Inhibition in Children with ADHD (2008) · cites this paper as Pliszka et al., 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PLISZKA, S. R., BORCHERDING, S. H., SPRATLEY, K., LEON, S., & IRICK, S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
1997-08
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
254???259
ISSN
0196-206X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036832001
Cited by
87
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
inhibitory control, stop-signal task, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, response inhibition, inattention, hyperactivity, behavioral problems, teacher ratings
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Reaction Time, Social Behavior Disorders, Volition, Reproducibility of Results, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review