Cited by 305Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchMedication Adherence and Compliance

Self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and diabetes self-management in adolescents with type 1 diabetes

IANNOTTI, RONALD J., SCHNEIDER, STEFAN, NANSEL, TONJA R., HAYNIE, DENISE L., PLOTNICK, LESLIE P., CLARK, LORETTA M., SOBEL, DOUGLAS O., SIMONS-MORTON, BRUCE·2006·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

The goal of this research was to develop and evaluate measures of adolescent diabetes management self-efficacy and outcome expectations that reflect developmentally relevant, situation-specific challenges to current diabetes regimens. Self-efficacy for diabetes management, expected outcomes of adherence, adherence to the diabetes regimen, and glycemic control were assessed in 168 adolescents (ages 10-16 years) with type 1 diabetes. Factor analyses indicated a single scale for self-efficacy and two distinct factors representing positive and negative outcome expectations. Reliability and predictive validity of the new scales were supported. In regression analyses, self-efficacy and the interaction of self-efficacy with expectations of positive outcomes were significantly associated with diabetes self-management adherence and glycemic control in older adolescents. The effect of self-efficacy was greatest when adolescents had stronger beliefs in the beneficial outcomes of adherence. These brief measures can be used to identify youths at risk of poor diabetes self-management. Interventions targeting self-efficacy may lead to improved diabetes self-management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004703-200604000-00003

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-efficacy for diabetes self-management is an important psychosocial factor linked to better self-management and treatment outcomes.

    “Patient perceptions about their own ability, or self-efficacy, to self-manage diabetes are one important psychosocial factor related to improved diabetes self-management and treatment outcomes in diabetes (22–26) and should be a target of ongoing assessment and treatment planning.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
IANNOTTI, R. J., SCHNEIDER, S., NANSEL, T. R., HAYNIE, D. L., PLOTNICK, L. P., CLARK, L. M., SOBEL, D. O., & SIMONS-MORTON, B.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
2006-04
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
98-105
ISSN
0196-206X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009185625
Cited by
305
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, adolescents, diabetes self-management, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, medication adherence, glycemic control, scale development, psychometric validation, self-management interventions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Cognition, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Self Care, Social Adjustment, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review