Cited by 74Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCoffee research and impactsSodium Intake and Health

Interactive effect of cigarettes and coffee on daytime systolic blood pressure in patients with mild essential hypertension

Narkiewicz, Krzysztof, Maraglino, Giuseppe, Biasion, Tiziano, Rossi, Gianpaolo, Sanzuol, Flavio, Palatini, Paolo·1995·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that moderate smoking (fewer than 20 cigarettes/day) and coffee consumption have an interactive effect on ambulatory blood pressure. DESIGN: A case-control study. SETTING: Patients in the multicentre Hypertension Ambulatory Venetia Study, northeastern Italy. SUBJECTS: Six hundred and forty-three men and 244 women with borderline-to-mild status (non-smokers versus smokers) and their habitual consumption of coffee (0, 1-3, or 4+ cups/day). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Office blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure, urinary adrenaline and noradrenaline levels according to smoking status, coffee consumption and their interaction. RESULTS: In the men, daytime systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly higher in the smokers than in the non-smokers and in the coffee drinkers than in the others. Moreover, two-way analysis of covariance revealed a significant interaction between smoking status and coffee consumption: the daytime SBP in smokers who drank 4+ cups/day of coffee was 6.0 mmHg higher than that of non-smokers who abstained from coffee. Conversely, office blood pressure was lower in the smokers than in the non-smokers and was similar in the coffee drinkers and the others. Coffee consumption had a significant effect on urinary adrenaline. Similar results were obtained in the women. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with what is shown by office blood pressure measurement, moderate smokers and coffee drinkers with mild hypertension have significantly higher daytime SBP levels than non-smokers and those who do not drink coffee. Cigarettes and coffee have an interactive effect on daytime SBP in young patients, with mild essential hypertension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004872-199509000-00005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Narkiewicz, K., Maraglino, G., Biasion, T., Rossi, G., Sanzuol, F., & Palatini, P.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
1995
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
965-970
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975709740
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
smoking, coffee consumption, mild essential hypertension, ambulatory blood pressure, office blood pressure, urinary adrenaline, urinary noradrenaline, interaction effects, young adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Pressure, Circadian Rhythm, Coffee, Epinephrine, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Smoking, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review