The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Insight and the Clinical Outcome of Schizopheric Patients
Abstract
At the time of discharge from their index hospitalizations, 52 schizophrenic patients initially admitted for acute psychotic episodes were assessed on an Insight and Treatment Attitudes Questionnaire. When these patients were followed up 2 1/2 to 3 1/2 years later, adequate information on their clinical courses and outcomes was available in 46 cases. A global assessment of aftercare environment was made in each case, reflecting the degree to which individuals other than the patient were helpfully invested in maintaining the patient in treatment, whether these individuals were in the patient's living or treatment situations. Five factual outcome variables were also assessed: a) compliance with treatment 30 days after discharge; b) long-term compliance; c) whether or not patients were readmitted; d) readmissions per year; and e) percent of time spent in the hospital. As expected, aftercare environment was significantly related to outcome (p = .039). The overall relationship between insight and the outcome variables closely approached statistical significance (p = .053). Patients with more insight were significantly less likely to be readmitted over the course of follow-up. There was a trend for patients with more insight to be compliant with treatment 30 days after discharge. No significant interaction between aftercare environment and insight was found, suggesting that insight may influence outcome independently of aftercare environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lacro, J. P., Dunn, L. B., Dolder, C. R., Leckband, S. G., & Jeste, D. V. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v63n1007 · Cited by 1,383
Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1995) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01499323 · Cited by 595
Self-citationLincoln, T. M., Lullmann, E., & Rief, W. (2006) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm002 · Cited by 486
The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. I: Mental illness and competence to consent to treatment.
Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1995) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01499321 · Cited by 424
Self-citationMohamed, S., Rosenheck, R., McEvoy, J., Swartz, M., Stroup, S., & Lieberman, J. A. (2009) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn067 · Cited by 258
Self-citationBarkhof, E., Meijer, C. J., de Sonneville, L. M. J., Linszen, D. H., & de Haan, L. (2012) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.02.005 · Cited by 183
Ghaemi, S. N. (2006) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbl061 · Cited by 107
Steinert, T., & Schmid, P. (2004) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.55.7.786 · Cited by 44
Quality of life in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Associations with insight and psychopathology
Margariti, M., Ploumpidis, D., Economou, M., Christodoulou, G. N., & Papadimitriou, G. N. (2015) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.11.016 · Cited by 41
Alene, M., Wiese, M. D., Angamo, M. T., Bajorek, B. V., Yesuf, E. A., & Wabe, N. T. (2012) · BMC Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1186/1472-6904-12-10 · Cited by 34
Chien, W. T., Chong, Y. Y., Bressington, D., & McMaster, C. W. (2024) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116046 · Cited by 11
“The 11-item Chinese-version ITAQ (i.e., translated and validated from the original ITAQ developed by McEvoy et al., 1989) measured patients ’ insight/recognition of their mental illness and attitudes towards treatment and medication needs.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- McEVOY, J. P., FRETER, S., EVERETT, G., GELLER, J. L., APPELBAUM, P., APPERSON, L. J., & ROTH, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-51
- ISSN
- 0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010794894
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.