Human Cortex Development: Estimates of Neuronal Numbers Indicate Major Loss Late During Gestation
Abstract
This morphometric study explores temporal and topographic changes in the estimated neuronal number in human neocortex during the latter half of gestation and early infancy. Neuronal estimates are calculated from standardized measurements of cortical layer thickness and neuronal density in 6 neocortical regions in 9 human brains ranging from 17 weeks of gestation to 13 weeks postnatally. Layer thickness increases linearly with age while the average neuronal density first increases, then reaches a maximum at 20 weeks of gestation, and progressively declines. The sum of layer thickness times layer density estimates the number of neurons in a cortical column with a fixed surface area and a length that is equal to the cortical thickness. To derive an estimate of potentially overproduced neurons, the number of neurons in each cortical column was corrected for surface growth and for cortex gyration. These data show that a large percent of cortical neurons present at 20 weeks of gestation are used to populate the expanding cortex. Nevertheless, the growth-corrected data suggest that a substantial overproduction and secondary reduction of cortical neurons takes place mainly during the last quarter of gestation. The corrected mean number of neurons reaches a maximum at 28 weeks of gestation and then declines by approximately 70% to achieve a stable number of neurons around birth. This estimated number of neurons is significantly higher at 28 to 32 weeks of gestation than at 17 to 20 gestational weeks and at 0 to 13 postnatal weeks. These data imply that physiologic neuronal death (apoptosis) may play a major role in early human cortex development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because proliferation of cortical neurons is exponential between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation and does not occur postnatally, pathological neuron excess cannot be caused by post-natal events and instead indicates neural disorder in ASD has a prenatal origin, likely by the first and/or second trimester.
“Because proliferation of cortical neurons is exponential between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation [43, 44] and does not occur postnatally, pathological neuron excess cannot be caused by post-natal events and instead indicates neural disorder in ASD has a prenatal origin, likely by the first and/or second trimester.”
From The ASD Living Biology: from cell proliferation to clinical phenotype (2019) · cites this paper as [43]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The basics of brain development
Stiles, J., & Jernigan, T. L. (2010) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-010-9148-4 · Cited by 2,009 · see citing works
Patches of Disorganization in the Neocortex of Children with Autism
Stoner, R., Chow, M. L., Boyle, M. P., Sunkin, S. M., Mouton, P. R., Roy, S., Wynshaw-Boris, A., Colamarino, S. A., Lein, E. S., & Courchesne, E. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1307491 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
Ontogeny of the human central nervous system: What is happening when?
de Graaf-Peters, V. B., & Hadders-Algra, M. (2006) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.10.013 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
The ASD Living Biology: from cell proliferation to clinical phenotype
Courchesne, E., Pramparo, T., Gazestani, V. H., Lombardo, M. V., Pierce, K., & Lewis, N. E. (2019) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0056-y · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Brain Neuroplasticity in Healthy, Hyperactive and Psychotic Children: Insights from Neuroimaging
Rapoport, J. L., & Gogtay, N. (2008) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301553 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Early human brain development: Starring the subplate
Hadders-Algra, M. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.06.017 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Global Network Organization of the Fetal Functional Connectome
De Asis-Cruz, J., Andersen, N., Kapse, K., Khrisnamurthy, D., Quistorff, J., Lopez, C., Vezina, G., & Limperopoulos, C. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa410 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rabinowicz, T., de Courten-Myers, G. M., Petetot, J. M.-C., XI, G., & de los Reyes, E.
- ORCID
- XI, Guohua
- Venue
- Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 320-328
- ISSN
- 0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4300577516
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- human cortex, cortical development, neurogenesis, neuronal migration, brain development
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Cell Count, Cerebral Cortex, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Linear Models, Apoptosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review