Cited by 70Cardiac Health and Mental HealthHealth disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and Disability

Depression, isolation, social support, and cardiovascular disease in older adults

Arthur, Heather M.·2006·The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Abstract

Research evidence related specifically to psychosocial issues in older adults with cardiovascular disease remains sparse; however, widespread recognition of the impact of the changing population demographic is spurring new research in this important area. National guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in several countries include recommendations related to psychosocial issues; authors are beginning to address the older cardiac patient in their recommendations. The purpose of this article is to highlight some key psychosocial factors that have been independently associated with coronary heart disease but to do so with a focus on the older adult in the secondary prevention setting. The selected psychosocial factors are social support, social isolation, and depression. Although evidence supports a relationship between psychosocial factors and coronary heart disease, the issue addressed in this article is whether such relationships hold true in the older adult and whether rehabilitation and secondary prevention interventions are targeted to address these factors. As much as possible, current recommendations (related to psychosocial issues) from worldwide Clinical Practice Guidelines are highlighted. Finally, any examination of psychosocial factors and coronary heart disease must consider the possibility of sex and/or gender differences. Therefore, a commentary on reported differences between men and women with respect to social support, social isolation, and depression is included.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005082-200609001-00002

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-systematic reviews have identified similar findings with respect to increased risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease and outcomes, and mental health, with less evidence for other physical health conditions and behaviours.

    “Non-systematic reviews have identified similar findings with respect to increased risk of mortality 59-64 , cardiovascular disease and outcomes 62, 65-72 , mental health 61, 62, 64, 73-90 , with less evidence for other physical health conditions and behaviours 72, 76, 80, 91-93 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arthur, H. M.
Affiliations
Heart and Stroke Foundation (CA)
Corresponding author
Arthur, Heather M.
Venue
The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Published
2006-09
Volume
21
Issue
5 Suppl 1
Pages
S2-S7
ISSN
0889-4655 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074994993
Cited by
70
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
depression, social isolation, social support, cardiovascular disease, older adults, coronary artery disease, secondary prevention, cardiac rehabilitation, psychosocial factors, sex differences, gender differences
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Social Isolation, Social Support, Global Health, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review