Cited by 560Cardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsWorkplace Health and Well-being

“Stress” and coronary heart disease: psychosocial risk factors

Bunker, Stephen J, Colquhoun, David M, Esler, Murray D, Hickie, Ian B, Hunt, David, Jelinek, V Michael, Oldenburg, Brian F, Peach, Hedley G +3 more·2003·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

An Expert Working Group of the National Heart Foundation of Australia undertook a review of systematic reviews of the evidence relating to major psychosocial risk factors to assess whether there are independent associations between any of the factors and the development and progression of coronary heart disease (CHD), or the occurrence of acute cardiac events. The expert group concluded that (i) there is strong and consistent evidence of an independent causal association between depression, social isolation and lack of quality social support and the causes and prognosis of CHD; and (ii) there is no strong or consistent evidence for a causal association between chronic life events, work-related stressors (job control, demands and strain), Type A behaviour patterns, hostility, anxiety disorders or panic disorders and CHD. The increased risk contributed by these psychosocial factors is of similar order to the more conventional CHD risk factors such as smoking, dyslipidaemia and hypertension. The identified psychosocial risk factors should be taken into account during individual CHD risk assessment and management, and have implications for public health policy and research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05193.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bunker, S. J., Colquhoun, D. M., Esler, M. D., Hickie, I. B., Hunt, D., Jelinek, V. M., Oldenburg, B. F., Peach, H. G., Ruth, D., Tennant, C. C., & Tonkin, A. M.
Affiliations
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Beyondblue (AU)
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Ballarat Health Services (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03
Volume
178
Issue
6
Pages
272-276
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W2416897121
Cited by
560
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 28
FWCI
23.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart Foundation of Australia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
coronary artery disease, psychosocial risk factors, depression, social isolation, social support, occupational stress, job control, Type A behavior pattern, hostility, anxiety disorders, panic disorder, cardiac risk assessment, cardiovascular risk management
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Coronary Disease, Depression, Hostility, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Hypertension, Life Change Events, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Smoking, Social Isolation, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Type A Personality, Work, Panic Disorder, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review