Cited by 149Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSinusitis and nasal conditions

Sleep Disordered Breathing: Surgical Outcomes in Prepubertal Children

Guilleminault, Christian, Li, Kasey K., Khramtsov, Andrei, Pelayo, Rafael, Martinez, Sandra·2004·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the treatment outcomes of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) in prepubertal children 3 months following surgical intervention. Study Design Retrospective investigation of 400 consecutively seen children with SDB who were referred to otolaryngologists for treatment. Method After masking the identities and conditions of the children, the following were tabulated: clinical symptoms, results of clinical evaluation and polysomnography at entry, the treatment chosen by the otolaryngologists, and clinical and polysomnographic results 3 months after surgery. Results Treatment ranged from nasal steroids to various surgical procedures. Adenotonsillectomy was performed in only 251 of 400 cases (68%). Four cases included adenotonsillectomy in conjunction with pharyngoplasty (closure of the tonsillar wound by suturing the anterior and posterior pillar to tighten the airway). Persistent SDB was seen in 58 of 400 children (14.5%), and an additional 8 had persistent snoring. Best results were with adenotonsillectomy. Conclusion SDB involves obstruction of the upper airway, which may be partially due to craniofacial structure involvement. The goal of surgical treatment should be aimed at enlarging the airway, and not be solely focused on treating inflammation or infection of the lymphoid tissues. This goal may not be met in some patients, thus potentially contributing to residual problems seen after surgery. The possibility of further treatment, including collaboration with orthodontists to improve the craniofacial risk factors, should be considered in children with residual problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005537-200401000-00024

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guilleminault, C., Li, K. K., Khramtsov, A., Pelayo, R., & Martinez, S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
114
Issue
1
Pages
132-137
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W2010627336
Cited by
149
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Keywords
sleep-disordered breathing, obstructive sleep apnea, prepubertal children, adenotonsillectomy, pharyngoplasty, upper airway obstruction, craniofacial structure, surgical outcomes, nasal steroids
MeSH terms
Adenoidectomy, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Pharynx, Preoperative Care, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Time Factors, Tonsillectomy, Turbinates, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Craniofacial Abnormalities, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review