Cited by 465Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

Updated systematic review of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy for treatment of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome

Friedman, Michael, Wilson, Meghan, Lin, Hsin‐Ching, Chang, Hsueh‐Wen·2009·Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the cure rate of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A) for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify English-language studies that evaluate the treatment of pediatric (age < 20 years) OSAHS patients with T&A using polysomnography as a metric of cure. Twenty-three studies fit the inclusion criteria and a meta-analysis was performed to determine the overall success. Meta-analysis was also performed to determine the success in obese and comorbid populations vs cohorts of healthy children. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 1079 subjects (mean sample size of 42 patients) with a mean age of 6.5 years. The effect measure was the percentage of pediatric patients with OSAHS who were successfully treated (k = 22 studies) with T&A based on preoperative and postoperative PSG data. Random-effects model estimated the treatment success of T&A was 66.3 percent, when cure was defined per each individual study. When "cure" was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of <1 (k = 9 studies), random-effects model estimate for OSAHS treatment success with T&A was 59.8 percent. Postoperative mean AHI was significantly decreased from preoperative levels. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to popular belief, meta-analysis of current literature demonstrates that pediatric sleep apnea is often not cured by T&A. Although complete resolution is not achieved in most cases, T&A still offers significant improvements in AHI, making it a valuable first-line treatment for pediatric OSAHS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.01.043

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friedman, M., Wilson, M., Lin, H., & Chang, H.
Affiliations
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center (US)
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
  • National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
Corresponding author
Friedman, Michael
Venue
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06
Volume
140
Issue
6
Pages
800-808
ISSN
  • 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
  • 0194-5998
  • 1097-6817
OpenAlex
W2022573597
Cited by
465
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 32
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
adenotonsillectomy, surgical cure rate, apnea-hypopnea index, polysomnography, childhood obesity, first-line therapy
MeSH terms
Adenoidectomy, Child, Humans, Obesity, Tonsillectomy, Models, Statistical, Comorbidity, Polysomnography, Evidence-Based Medicine, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review