Cited by 75Primary Care and Health OutcomesEmergency and Acute Care StudiesChronic Disease Management Strategies

Emergency Department Visits and Primary Care Among Adults With Chronic Conditions

McCusker, Jane, Roberge, Danièle, Lévesque, Jean-Frédéric, Ciampi, Antonio, Vadeboncoeur, Alain, Larouche, Danielle, Sanche, Steven·2010·Medical Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An emergency department (ED) visit may be a marker for limited access to primary medical care, particularly among those with ambulatory care sensitive chronic conditions (ACSCC). OBJECTIVES: In a population with universal health insurance, to examine the relationships between primary care characteristics and location of last general physician (GP) contact (in an ED vs. elsewhere) among those with and without an ACSCC. RESEARCH DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey using data from 2 cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey carried out in 2003 and 2005. SUBJECTS: The study sample comprised Québec residents aged ≥18 who reported at least one GP contact during the previous 12 months, and were not hospitalized (n = 33,491). MEASURES: The primary outcome was place of last GP contact: in an ED versus elsewhere. Independent variables included the following: lack of a regular physician, perceived unmet healthcare needs, perceived availability of health care, number of contacts with doctors and nurses, and diagnosis of an ACSCC (hypertension, heart disease, chronic respiratory disease, diabetes). RESULTS: Using multiple logistic regression, with adjustment for sociodemographic, health status, and health services variables, lack of a regular GP and perceptions of unmet needs were associated with last GP contact in an ED; there was no interaction with ACSCC or other chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care characteristics associated with GP contact in an ED rather than another site reflect individual characteristics (affiliation with a primary GP and perceived needs) rather than the geographic availability of healthcare, both among those with and without chronic conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181eaf86d

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCusker, J., Roberge, D., Lévesque, J.-F., Ciampi, A., Vadeboncoeur, A., Larouche, D., & Sanche, S.
Affiliations
  • St Mary's Hospital Centre (CA)
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec (CA)
  • Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne (CA)
Corresponding author
  • McCusker, Jane
  • Ciampi, Antonio
  • Sanche, Steven
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2010-11
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
972-980
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014758730
Cited by
75
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
emergency department visits, primary care, unmet health needs, chronic disease, hypertension, heart disease, chronic respiratory disease, diabetes mellitus, primary care access, universal health insurance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Care, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Medical Indigency, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Primary Health Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Quebec, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review