The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Primary Care Assessment Survey: Tests of Data Quality and Measurement Performance
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The authors examine the data quality and measurement performance of the Primary Care Assessment Survey (PCAS), a patient-completed questionnaire that operationalizes formal definitions of primary care, including the definition recently proposed by the Institute of Medicine Committee on the Future of Primary Care. METHODS: The PCAS measures seven domains of care through 11 summary scales: accessibility (organizational, financial), continuity (longitudinal, visit-based), comprehensiveness (contextual knowledge of patient, preventive counseling), integration, clinical interaction (clinician-patient communication, thoroughness of physical examinations), interpersonal treatment, and trust. Data from a study of Massachusetts state employees (n = 6094) were used to evaluate key measurement properties of the 11 PCAS scales. Analyses were performed on the combined population and for each of the 16 subgroups defined according to sociodemographic and health characteristics. RESULTS: The 11 PCAS scales demonstrated consistently strong measurement characteristics across all subgroups of this adult population. Tests of scaling assumptions for summated rating scales were well satisfied by all Likert-scaled measures. Assessment of data completeness, scale score dispersion characteristics, and inter-scale correlations provide strong evidence for the soundness of all scales, and for the value of separately measuring and interpreting these concepts. CONCLUSIONS: With public and private sector policies increasingly emphasizing the importance of primary care, the need for tools to evaluate and improve primary care performance is clear. The PCAS has excellent measurement properties, and performs consistently well across varied segments of the adult population. Widespread application of an assessment methodology, such as the PCAS, will afford an empiric basis through which to measure, monitor, and continuously improve primary care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,517
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Rosner, B., & Cronbach, L. J. (1960) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419921 · Cited by 4,513
Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, Jr., Robert P., R., Richard L., C., & Brad, S. (1975) · doi:10.21236/ada006655 · Cited by 3,497
Gaps in Doctor-Patient Communication: Patients' Response to Medical Advice
Francis, V., Korsch, B. M., & Morris, M. J. (1969) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm196903062801004 · Cited by 997
DiMatteo, M. R., Sherbourne, C. D., Hays, R. D., & Ordway, L. (1993) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.12.2.93 · Cited by 812
Kincaid, J. P., Robert, P. F. L., Richard, L. R., & Brad, S. (1975) · Cited by 739
Primary Care: Concept, Evaluation, And Policy
Bárbara (1992) · Cited by 501
A new approach to explaining sick-role behavior in low-income populations.
Becker, M. H., Drachman, R. H., & Kirscht, J. P. (1974) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.64.3.205 · Cited by 360
Behavioral consequences of consumer dissatisfaction with medical care
Ware, J. E., & Davis, A. R. (1983) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(83)90009-5 · Cited by 357
Self-citationHOW WELL DO PATIENTS TAKE ORAL PENICILLIN? A COLLABORATIVE STUDY IN PRIVATE PRACTICE
Charney, E., Bynum, R., Eldredge, D., Frank, D., MacWhinney, J. B., McNabb, N., Scheiner, A., Sumpter, E. A., & Iker, H. (1967) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.40.2.188 · Cited by 343
Cited by
Boyd, C. M., Darer, J., Boult, C., Fried, L. P., Boult, L., & Wu, A. W. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.6.716 · Cited by 2,581
Epstein, R. M., Franks, P., Fiscella, K., Shields, C. G., Meldrum, S. C., Kravitz, R. L., & Duberstein, P. R. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.001 · Cited by 1,211
Measuring Patients’ Trust in their Primary Care Providers
Hall, M. A., Zheng, B., Dugan, E., Camacho, F., Kidd, K. E., Mishra, A., & Balkrishnan, R. (2002) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558702059003004 · Cited by 661
Defining and Measuring the Patient-Centered Medical Home
Stange, K. C., Nutting, P. A., Miller, W. L., Jaén, C. R., Crabtree, B. F., Flocke, S. A., & Gill, J. M. (2010) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1291-3 · Cited by 516
Clinicians' Implicit Ethnic/Racial Bias and Perceptions of Care Among Black and Latino Patients
Blair, I. V., Steiner, J. F., Fairclough, D. L., Hanratty, R., Price, D. W., Hirsh, H. K., Wright, L. A., Bronsert, M., Karimkhani, E., Magid, D. J., et al. (2013) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1442 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Safran, D. G., Kosinski, M., Tarlov, A. R., Rogers, W. H., Taira, D. A., Lieberman, N., & Ware, J. E.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 728-739
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995005198
- Cited by
- 687
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 22.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Primary Care Assessment Survey: Tests of Data Quality and Measurement Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005650-199805000-00012
- The paper
- Safran, D. G., Kosinski, M., Tarlov, A. R., Rogers, W. H., Taira, D. A., Lieberman, N., & Ware, J. E. (1998). The Primary Care Assessment Survey: Tests of Data Quality and Measurement Performance. Medical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199805000-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.