CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 552Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked

BASSETT, DAVID R., AINSWORTH, BARBARA E., LEGGETT, SUE R., MATHIEN, CLARA A., MAIN, JAMES A., HUNTER, DAVID C., DUNCAN, GLEN E.·1996·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
DOI 10.1097/00005768-199608000-00019
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This is a three-part study that examined the accuracy of five brands of electronic pedometers (Freestyle Pacer, Eddie Bauer, L.L. Bean, Yamax, and Accusplit) under a variety of different conditions. In Part I, 20 subjects walked a 4.88-km sidewalk course while wearing two devices of the same brand (on the left and right side of the body) for each of five different trials. There were significant differences among pedometers (P < 0.05), with the Yamax, Pacer, and Accusplit approximating the actual distance more closely than the other models. The Yamax pedometers showed close agreement, but the left and right Pacer pedometers differed significantly (P = 0.0003) and the Accusplit displayed a similar trend (P = 0.0657). In Part II, the effects of walking surface on pedometer accuracy were examined. Ten of the original subjects completed an additional five trials around a 400-m rubberized outdoor track. The devices showed similar values for sidewalk and track surfaces. In Part III, the effects of walking speed on pedometer accuracy were examined. Ten different subjects walked on a treadmill at various speeds (54, 67, 80, 94, and 107 m.min-1). Pedometers that displayed both distance and number of steps were examined. The Yamax was more accurate than the Pacer and Eddie Bauer at slow-to-moderate speeds (P < 0.05), though no significant differences were seen at the fastest speed. While there are variations among brands in terms of accuracy, electronic pedometers may prove useful in recording walking activities in free-living populations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005768-199608000-00019

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gayle, 1977, Res Q, 48, 632
  2. Washburn, 1980, Res Q, 51, 695

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 548

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
BASSETT, D. R., AINSWORTH, B. E., LEGGETT, S. R., MATHIEN, C. A., MAIN, J. A., HUNTER, D. C., & DUNCAN, G. E.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
ORCID
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
1996-08
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
1071-1077
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/00005768-199608000-00019
OpenAlex
W2003135851
Cited by
552
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 27
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
walking distance, walking speed, walking surfaces, step counting
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Electronics, Equipment and Supplies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Exercise, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review