The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring general levels of physical activity: preliminary evidence for the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children
Abstract
This article reports three studies that investigated psychometric properties of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C). The PAQ-C is a guided self-administered 7-day recall measure designed to assess general physical activity levels during the school year for children in grades four and higher. Study one, with 215 students ranging in age from 9 to 15 yr, found the PAQ-C had acceptable item and test score characteristics such as item distribution, corrected item-total correlations, and internal consistency. Study two, involving 84 students ranging from 9 to 14 yr, indicated acceptable levels of test-retest reliability for both males (r = 0.75) and females (r = 0.82) after 1 wk. The third study used Generalizability theory to investigate the reliability for using the average of either two or three PAQ-C scores collected during fall, winter, and spring seasons. Based on the responses of 200 students ranging from 8 to 16 yr, generalizability coefficients exceeded 0.80 for either the average of two or three responses for both younger (<13 yr) and older subjects. In all three studies, the PAQ-C demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and males were significantly more active than females. These results provide preliminary support for the PAQ-C as a cost efficient method of assessing general levels of children's physical activity during the school year.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY IN THE FIVE-CITY PROJECT1
SALLIS, J. F., HASKELL, W. L., WOOD, P. D., FORTMANN, S. P., ROGERS, T., BLAIR, S. N., & PAFFENBARGER, R. S. (1985) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113987 · Cited by 1,716
Cited by
A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents
SALLIS, J. F., PROCHASKA, J. J., & TAYLOR, W. C. (2000) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200005000-00014 · Cited by 4,421
Assessment of physical activity by self-report: Status, limitations, and future directions
Sallis, J. F., & Saelens, B. E. (2000) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2000.11082780 · Cited by 2,351
Environmental correlates of physical activity in youth – a review and update
Ferreira, I., Van Der Horst, K., Wendel‐Vos, W., Kremers, S., Van Lenthe, F. J., & Brug, J. (2007) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2006.00264.x · Cited by 993
Schmidt, M., Jäger, K., Egger, F., Roebers, C. M., & Conzelmann, A. (2015) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.2015-0069 · Cited by 329
School-Based Physical Activity Does Not Compromise Children's Academic Performance
AHAMED, Y., MACDONALD, H., REED, K., NAYLOR, P.-J., LIU-AMBROSE, T., & MCKAY, H. (2007) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000241654.45500.8e · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- CROCKER, P. R. E., BAILEY, D. A., FAULKNER, R. A., KOWALSKI, K. C., & McGRATH, R.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1344-1349
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970224163
- Cited by
- 982
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.