Cited by 57Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthReliability and Agreement in Measurement

Reproducibility of cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic responses to submaximal exercise: The HERITAGE Family Study

WILMORE, JACK H., STANFORTH, PHILIP R., TURLEY, KENNETH R., GAGNON, JACQUES, DAW, E. WARWICK, LEON, ARTHUR S., RAO, D. C., SKINNER, JAMES S. +1 more·1998·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

This study determined the reproducibility of cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic responses to submaximal cycle ergometer exercise at two power outputs (50 W and 60% VO2max) on each of two separate days in a sample of 390 subjects (198 men and 192 women) participating in the HERITAGE Family Study. The same protocol was conducted across 3 d in an intracenter quality control substudy which included an additional 55 subjects. Reproducibility estimates included technical error, coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation for each of the selected variables for both subject populations. Further, since the data were collected across four clinical centers, intraclass correlations were also computed separately by clinical center. Most variables were highly reproducible, with coefficients of variation below 9% and intraclass correlations over 0.80. These results were consistent for both subject populations and across all four clinical centers. Reproducibility indicators were generally better at the higher power output. It is concluded that within-subject day-to-day variation and measurement unreliabilities are generally small compared with the between-subject variance in the response to submaximal exercise at each of the clinical centers of the HERITAGE Family Study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005768-199802000-00014

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The technical error (TE) for the risk factors was quantified from repeated measurements in 60 subjects over 3 weeks.

    “Sixty subjects were measured three times over a period of three weeks, and variation in resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and in fasting plasma HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), and insulin (FI) was quantified.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WILMORE, J. H., STANFORTH, P. R., TURLEY, K. R., GAGNON, J., DAW, E. W., LEON, A. S., RAO, D. C., SKINNER, J. S., & BOUCHARD, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
1998-02
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
259-265
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019149960
Cited by
57
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 45670, HL47323, R01HL047317, R01HL047323, HL47317, R01HL045670)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
reproducibility, submaximal exercise, cycle ergometry, cardiovascular response, respiratory response, metabolic response, measurement reliability, technical errors, coefficient of variation, intraclass correlation coefficient, day-to-day variability, HERITAGE Family Study, output power, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena, Energy Metabolism, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Education and Training, Physical Endurance, Respiration, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review