Reproducibility of cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic responses to submaximal exercise: The HERITAGE Family Study
Abstract
This study determined the reproducibility of cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic responses to submaximal cycle ergometer exercise at two power outputs (50 W and 60% VO2max) on each of two separate days in a sample of 390 subjects (198 men and 192 women) participating in the HERITAGE Family Study. The same protocol was conducted across 3 d in an intracenter quality control substudy which included an additional 55 subjects. Reproducibility estimates included technical error, coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation for each of the selected variables for both subject populations. Further, since the data were collected across four clinical centers, intraclass correlations were also computed separately by clinical center. Most variables were highly reproducible, with coefficients of variation below 9% and intraclass correlations over 0.80. These results were consistent for both subject populations and across all four clinical centers. Reproducibility indicators were generally better at the higher power output. It is concluded that within-subject day-to-day variation and measurement unreliabilities are generally small compared with the between-subject variance in the response to submaximal exercise at each of the clinical centers of the HERITAGE Family Study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The technical error (TE) for the risk factors was quantified from repeated measurements in 60 subjects over 3 weeks.
“Sixty subjects were measured three times over a period of three weeks, and variation in resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and in fasting plasma HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), and insulin (FI) was quantified.”
From Adverse metabolic response to regular exercise: is it a rare or common occurrence? (2012) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 23,433 · see citing works
Aims, design, and measurement protocol
BOUCHARD, C., LEON, A. S., RAO, D. C., SKINNER, J. S., WlLMORE, J. H., & GAGNON, J. (1995) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/00005768-199505000-00015 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Balady, G. J., Arena, R., Sietsema, K., Myers, J., Coke, L., Fletcher, G. F., Forman, D., Franklin, B., Guazzi, M., Gulati, M., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3181e52e69 · Cited by 1,964 · see citing works
Bouchard, C., An, P., Rice, T., Skinner, J. S., Wilmore, J. H., Gagnon, J., Pérusse, L., Leon, A. S., & Rao, D. C. (1999) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1999.87.3.1003 · Cited by 875 · see citing works
Self-citationAdverse metabolic response to regular exercise: is it a rare or common occurrence?
Bouchard, C., Blair, S. N., Church, T. S., Earnest, C. P., Hagberg, J. M., Häkkinen, K., Jenkins, N. T., Karavirta, L., Kraus, W. E., Leon, A. S., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037887 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
“Sixty subjects were measured three times (except for FI) over a period of 3 weeks for each trait [15,16,17,18,19].”
BackgroundSelf-citationSARZYNSKI, M. A., RICE, T. K., DESPRÉS, J.-P., PÉRUSSE, L., TREMBLAY, A., STANFORTH, P. R., TCHERNOF, A., BARBER, J. L., FALCIANI, F., CLISH, C., et al. (2022) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002859 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationRankinen, T., Sung, Y. J., Sarzynski, M. A., Rice, T. K., Rao, D. C., & Bouchard, C. (2012) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01287.2011 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationHayden, G., Milne, H. C., Patterson, M. J., & Nimmo, M. A. (2004) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-004-1057-x · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- WILMORE, J. H., STANFORTH, P. R., TURLEY, K. R., GAGNON, J., DAW, E. W., LEON, A. S., RAO, D. C., SKINNER, J. S., & BOUCHARD, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 259-265
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019149960
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 45670, HL47323, R01HL047317, R01HL047323, HL47317, R01HL045670)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Keywords
- reproducibility, submaximal exercise, cycle ergometry, cardiovascular response, respiratory response, metabolic response, measurement reliability, technical errors, coefficient of variation, intraclass correlation coefficient, day-to-day variability, HERITAGE Family Study, output power, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena, Energy Metabolism, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Education and Training, Physical Endurance, Respiration, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review