CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 329Bone health and osteoporosis researchPhysical Activity and HealthEffects of Vibration on Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of progressive resistance training on bone density: a review

LAYNE, JENNIFER E., NELSON, MIRIAM E.·1999·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
DOI 10.1097/00005768-199901000-00006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a major public health problem that is characterized by low bone mass and increased susceptibility to fractures, primarily of the hip, spine, and wrist. It is estimated to cause 1.5 million fractures annually in the United States in people aged 50 yr and older. Physical activity, particularly weight-bearing exercise, is thought to provide the mechanical stimuli or "loading" important for the maintenance and improvement of bone health, whereas physical inactivity has been implicated in bone loss and its associated health costs. Both aerobic and resistance training exercise can provide weight-bearing stimulus to bone, yet research indicates that resistance training may have a more profound site specific effect than aerobic exercise. Over the past 10 years, nearly two dozen cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have shown a direct and positive relationship between the effects of resistance training and bone density. Conversely, a handful of other studies have reported little or no effect on bone density. However, these results may be partially attributable to the study design, intensity and duration of the exercise protocol, and the bone density measurement techniques used. High-intensity resistance training, in contrast to traditional pharmacological and nutritional approaches for improving bone health in older adults, has the added benefit of influencing multiple risk factors for osteoporosis including improved strength and balance and increased muscle mass.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005768-199901000-00006

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 329

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
LAYNE, J. E., & NELSON, M. E.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
1999-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
25-30
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/00005768-199901000-00006
OpenAlex
W2026817661
Cited by
329
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Effects of Vibration on Health
Keywords
progressive resistance training, bone mineral density, osteoporosis, weight-bearing exercise, mechanical loading, bone loss, physical inactivity, aerobic exercise, older adults, exercise intensity, muscle mass, balance
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Osteoporosis, Weight Lifting, Bone Density, Weight-Bearing, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review