Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 455

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human hamstring muscles adapt to eccentric exercise by changing optimum length

BROCKETT, CAMILLA L., MORGAN, DAVID L., PROSKE, UWE·2001·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is now established that unaccustomed eccentric exercise leads to muscle fiber damage and to delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in the days after exercise. However, a second bout of eccentric exercise, a week after the first, produces much less damage and soreness. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence from muscle mechanical properties of a proposed mechanism for this training effect in human hamstring muscles. METHODS: The eccentric exercise involved 12 sets of 6 repetition "hamstring lowers," performed on specially designed equipment. Hamstring angle-torque curves were constructed for each of 10 subjects (8 male and 2 female) while they performed maximum voluntary knee extension and flexion movements on an isokinetic dynamometer. Testing sessions were performed over the week before eccentric exercise, immediately post exercise, and daily, up to 8 d post exercise. Subject soreness ratings and leg girth measurements were also made post exercise. Six subjects performed a second bout of eccentric exercise, 8 d after the first, and measurements were continued up to 10 d beyond that. RESULTS: There was a significant shift in the optimum angle for torque generation (Lo), to longer muscle lengths immediately post exercise (7.7 degrees +/- 2.1 degrees, P < 0.01), indicating an increase in series compliance within some muscle fibers. Subsequent measurements showed increases in leg girth and some muscle soreness, suggesting muscle damage. The shift in Lo persisted, even after other injury parameters had returned to normal, consistent with a training effect. Subjects also showed fewer signs of muscle damage after the second exercise bout. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show a sustained shift in optimum angle of human muscle as a protective strategy against injury from eccentric exercise. Implications of this work for athletes, particularly those prone to hamstring strains are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005768-200105000-00017

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
BROCKETT, C. L., MORGAN, D. L., & PROSKE, U.
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2001-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
783-790
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165379377
Cited by
455
References
3
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.