Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,118

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits?

BLAIR, STEVEN N., CHENG, YILING, SCOTT HOLDER, J.·2001·Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: We addressed three questions: 1) Is there a dose-response relation between physical activity and health? 2) Is there a dose-response relation between cardiorespiratory fitness and health? 3) If both activity and fitness have a dose-response relation to health, is it possible to determine which exposure is more important? METHODS: We identified articles by PubMed search (restricted from 1/1/90 to 8/25/00) using keywords related to physical activity, physical fitness, and health. An author scanned titles and abstracts of 9831 identified articles. We included for thorough review articles that included three or more categories of activity or fitness and a health outcome and excluded articles on clinical trials, review papers, comments, letters, case reports, and nonhuman studies. We used an evidence-based approach to evaluate the quality of the published data. RESULTS: We summarized results from 67 articles meeting final selection criteria. There is good consensus across studies with most showing an inverse dose-response gradient across both activity and fitness categories for morbidity from coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, cardiovascular disease (CVD), or cancer; and for CVD, cancer, or all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: All studies reviewed were prospective observational investigations; thus, conclusions are based on Evidence Category C. 1) There is a consistent gradient across activity groups indicating greater longevity and reduced risk of CHD, CVD, stroke, and colon cancer in more active individuals. 2) Studies are compelling in the consistency and steepness of the gradient across fitness groups. Most show a curvilinear gradient, with a steep slope at low levels of fitness and an asymptote in the upper part of the fitness distribution. 3) It is not possible to conclude whether activity or fitness is more important for health. Future studies should define more precisely the shape of the dose-response gradient across activity or fitness groups, evaluate the role of musculoskeletal fitness, and investigate additional health outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005768-200106001-00007

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bergstrom, 1999, Int J Cancer, 83, 186, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19991008)83:2<186::AID-IJC7>3.0.CO;2-6 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19991008)83:2<186::aid-ijc7>3.0.co;2-6
  2. Farrell, 1998, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 30, 899
  3. Huang, 1998, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 30, 1430
  4. Thune, 1997, Int J Cancer, 70, 57, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970106)70:1<57::AID-IJC9>3.0.CO;2-5 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19970106)70:1<57::aid-ijc9>3.0.co;2-5

Cited by

See all 1,118

Metadata

Authors
BLAIR, S. N., CHENG, Y., & SCOTT HOLDER, J.
Venue
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Published
2001-06
Volume
33
Issue
Supplement
Pages
S379-S399
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976031759
Cited by
1,118
References
73
FWCI
11.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005768-200106001-00007
The paper
BLAIR, S. N., CHENG, Y., & SCOTT HOLDER, J. (2001). Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits? Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200106001-00007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.