Cited by 788Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyCardiovascular Effects of Exercise

Physical Fitness as a Predictor of Mortality among Healthy, Middle-Aged Norwegian Men

Sandvik, Leiv, Erikssen, Jan, Thaulow, Erik, Erikssen, Gunnar, Mundal, Reidar, Rodahl, Kaare·1993·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Despite many studies suggesting that poor physical fitness is an independent risk factor for death from cardiovascular causes, the matter has remained controversial. We studied this question in a 16-year follow-up investigation of Norwegian men that began in 1972. Methods Our study included 1960 healthy men 40 to 59 years of age (84 percent of those invited to participate). Conventional coronary risk factors and physical fitness were assessed at base line, with physical fitness measured as the total work performed on a bicycle ergometer during a symptom-limited exercise-tolerance test. Results After an average follow-up time of 16 years, 271 men had died, 53 percent of them from cardiovascular disease. The relative risk of death from any cause in fitness quartile 4 (highest) as compared with quartile 1 (lowest) was 0.54 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.89; P = 0.015) after adjustment for age, smoking status, serum lipids, blood pressure, resting heart rate, vital capacity, body-mass index, level of physical activity, and glucose tolerance. Total mortality was similar among the subjects in fitness quartiles 1, 2, and 3 when the data were adjusted for these same variables. The adjusted relative risk of death from cardiovascular causes in fitness quartile 4 as compared with quartile 1 was 0.41 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.84; P = 0.013). The corresponding relative risks for quartiles 3 and 2 (as compared with quartile 1) were 0.45 (95 percent c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199302253280803

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sandvik, L., Erikssen, J., Thaulow, E., Erikssen, G., Mundal, R., & Rodahl, K.
Affiliations
  • Akershus University Hospital (NO)
  • National University Hospital (SG)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1993-02-25
Volume
328
Issue
8
Pages
533-537
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2328965873
Cited by
788
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 27
FWCI
18.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Keywords
physical fitness, mortality, cardiovascular mortality, middle-aged men, exercise tolerance, cycle ergometer, coronary risk factors, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular risk prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Norway, Physical Fitness, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Smoking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review