Cited by 313Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Shared Values: Impact On Staff Nurse Job Satisfaction And Perceived Productivity

KRAMER, MARLENE, HAFNER, LAURIN P.·1989·Nursing Research

Abstract

A nationwide study on the impact of shared values on staff nurse job satisfaction and perceived productivity was done in 24 hospitals under different auspices, some of which were also Magnet Hospitals. Data were obtained from a 25% random sample of the staff nurse population (N = 2,336), 58% of the head nurse group, 65% of the clinical experts, and 66% of the top management. Staff nurses and clinical experts had more value congruence than did staff nurses and head nurses. A significant inverse correlation was found between value congruence and nurse job satisfaction and quality care. Explanations of the finding center on recent role changes for both staff nurses and head nurses, power differential, and evolving clarity of the staff nurse role. A serendipitious finding was that staff nurses reported fewer factors as important to their job satisfaction and perceived environment conducive to quality patient care than did other members of the nursing department. However, factors important to staff nurses were very important.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006199-198905000-00019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
KRAMER, M., & HAFNER, L. P.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Venue
Nursing Research
Published
1989-05
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
172???177
ISSN
0029-6562 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044427363
Cited by
313
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
FWCI
22.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
shared values, value congruence, staff nurses, nursing satisfaction, perceived productivity, Magnet hospitals, nursing leadership, nurse managers, clinical experts, power imbalance, quality of care, organizational values
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Efficiency, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Nurse Administrators, Nurse Clinicians, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Nursing, Supervisory, Quality of Health Care, Sampling Studies, Social Values, Nursing Administration Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review