The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Shared Values: Impact On Staff Nurse Job Satisfaction And Perceived Productivity
Abstract
A nationwide study on the impact of shared values on staff nurse job satisfaction and perceived productivity was done in 24 hospitals under different auspices, some of which were also Magnet Hospitals. Data were obtained from a 25% random sample of the staff nurse population (N = 2,336), 58% of the head nurse group, 65% of the clinical experts, and 66% of the top management. Staff nurses and clinical experts had more value congruence than did staff nurses and head nurses. A significant inverse correlation was found between value congruence and nurse job satisfaction and quality care. Explanations of the finding center on recent role changes for both staff nurses and head nurses, power differential, and evolving clarity of the staff nurse role. A serendipitious finding was that staff nurses reported fewer factors as important to their job satisfaction and perceived environment conducive to quality patient care than did other members of the nursing department. However, factors important to staff nurses were very important.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–312 of 312
De verpleegkundige werkomgeving
Heinen, M. M., & van Oostveen, C. (2020) · Bohn Stafleu van Loghum eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-368-2447-7_3
Ramadge, J. (2000) · Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia · doi:10.1016/s1322-7696(08)60393-5
De verpleegkundige werkomgeving
Heinen, M. M., Huis, A. M. P., & van Oostveen, C. (2018) · Bohn Stafleu van Loghum eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-368-2085-1_3
Evolution of an Instrument: Measuring the Nursing Work Environment: A Scoping Review
Campbell, C. M., Warshawsky, N. E., Swiger, P. A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Nursing Measurement · doi:10.1891/jnm-2022-0028
Psychometric Testing of a Composite Score for Job Satisfaction of Newly Licensed Registered Nurses
Kurkowski, J., Dowdell, E. B., & Greenle, M. M. (2024) · Journal of Nursing Measurement · doi:10.1891/jnm-2023-0048
Development of a Leadership Behavior Scale for Visiting Nurse Managers
Kamimoto, T., & Ikezaki, S. (2025) · Journal of Japan Academy of Nursing Science · doi:10.5630/jans.45.152
Kim, S. Y., & Ko, Y. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13172080 · Cited by 2
“Based on the organizational characteristics of magnet hospitals with good working environments in the United States, Kramer and Hafner [26] developed the Nursing Work Index (NWI), which was modified by Aiken and Patrician [27] to develop the Revised Nursing Work Index (NWI-R).”
Ogata, Y., Sasaki, M., Fujiyoshi-Ito, A., Lapreziosa, N., & Yonekura, Y. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.97403
“Several instruments were developed to measure the organizational characteristics of these hospitals, including the Nursing Work Index (NWI) [7], Revised Nursing Work Index (NWI-R) [8], and Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) [9].”
Oh, B., & Kim, K. (2026) · International Emergency Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2026.101903
A Focus on Nurse Wellness Time for Action
Fernquist, M. (1999) · Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)
Factors associated with professional nursing practice in medical-surgical nurses
Palmer, J. C. (1990) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)
Metadata
- Authors
- KRAMER, M., & HAFNER, L. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Reno (US)
- Venue
- Nursing Research
- Published
- 1989-05
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 172???177
- ISSN
- 0029-6562 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044427363
- Semantic Scholar
- 4e940462f3ce758a76551a862081807f35d128a3
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 22.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- shared values, value congruence, staff nurses, nursing satisfaction, perceived productivity, Magnet hospitals, nursing leadership, nurse managers, clinical experts, power imbalance, quality of care, organizational values
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Efficiency, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Nurse Administrators, Nurse Clinicians, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Nursing, Supervisory, Quality of Health Care, Sampling Studies, Social Values, Nursing Administration Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
