Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ocular Component Data in Schoolchildren as a Function of Age and Gender

Karla Zadnik, Ruth E. Manny, Julie A. Yu, Gladys Lynn Mitchell, Susan A. Cotter, Julio C. Quiralte, Melvin D. Shipp, Nina E. Friedman, Robert N. Kleinstein, Terry W. Walker, Lisa Anne Jones, Melvin L. Moeschberger, Donald O. Mutti, The Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error (CLEERE) Study Group·2003·Optometry and Vision Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the refractive error and ocular components of a large group of school-aged children as a function of age and gender. METHODS: In this report, we describe the refractive error and ocular components of 2583 school-aged children (49.3% girls, overall mean [+/-SD] age 10.0 +/- 2.3). Measurement methods included cycloplegic autorefraction, autokeratometry, videophakometry, and A-scan ultrasonography. For statistical comparisons across gender and age, a critical point of alpha = 0.005 was used to assess significance because of the large sample size and the large number of comparisons made. RESULTS: Of these 2583 children, 10.1% were myopic (-0.75 D or more myopia in both meridians), and 8.6% were hyperopic (+1.25 D or more hyperopia in both meridians). As would be expected, there was a significant effect of age on refractive error (spherical equivalent, p < 0.0001), toward less hyperopia/more myopia. There was no significant difference in the average refractive error between girls and boys (p = 0.0192). Girls had steeper corneas than boys (0.74 D steeper in the vertical meridian and 0.63 D steeper in the horizontal meridian, p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in corneal power with age (p = 0.16). Both older age and male gender were significantly associated with deeper anterior chambers (p < 0.0001 for both). The crystalline lens showed significant thinning with age (p < 0.0001), however, there was no significant difference in the lens thickness between girls and boys (p = 0.66). Both Gullstrand lens power and calculated lens power showed significant effects of age and gender (p < 0.0001 for both). Girls, on average, had Gullstrand lens powers that were 0.28 D steeper and calculated lens powers that were 0.80 D more powerful than boys. Axial length also showed significant effects of age and gender (p < 0.0001 for both). Girls' eyes were, on average, 0.32 mm shorter than those of boys. CONCLUSIONS: These cross-sectional data show a general pattern of ocular growth, no change in corneal power, and crystalline lens thinning and flattening between the ages of 6 and 14 years. Girls tended to have steeper corneas, stronger crystalline lenses, and shorter eyes compared with boys.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1002/j.1538-9235.2003.tb01623.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Zadnik, K., Manny, R. E., Yu, J. A., Mitchell, G. L., Cotter, S. A., Quiralte, J. C., Shipp, M. D., Friedman, N. E., Kleinstein, R. N., Walker, T. W., Jones, L. A., Moeschberger, M. L., Mutti, D. O., & The Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error (CLEERE) Study Group
Venue
Optometry and Vision Science
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Published
2003-03-01
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
226-236
ISSN
1040-5488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019749559
Cited by
253
References
7
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ocular Component Data in Schoolchildren as a Function of Age and Gender. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1538-9235.2003.tb01623.x
The paper
Zadnik, K., Manny, R. E., Yu, J. A., Mitchell, G. L., Cotter, S. A., Quiralte, J. C., Shipp, M. D., Friedman, N. E., Kleinstein, R. N., Walker, T. W., Jones, L. A., Moeschberger, M. L., Mutti, D. O., & The Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error (CLEERE) Study Group. (2003). Ocular Component Data in Schoolchildren as a Function of Age and Gender. Optometry and Vision Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-9235.2003.tb01623.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.