CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 63Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Total Ear Replantation

Kind, Gabriel M., Buncke, Gregory M., Placik, Otto J., Jansen, David A., DʼAmore, Tancredi, Buncke, Harry J.·1997·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
DOI 10.1097/00006534-199706000-00008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Since the first report of successful microsurgical ear replantation in 1980, there have been 12 other cases reported in the English literature. As the number of trained microsurgeons increases, the opportunity to treat the amputated ear with microsurgical techniques should become more common. The reported cases have involved a variety of different mechanisms of injury and methods of treatment. There have been three techniques used to revascularize the amputated ear successfully: primary vascular repair, vein grafting, and use of the superficial temporal vessels as a pedicled vascular leash. Through our own experience and a review of the literature, we have been able to identify certain clinical characteristics that help dictate which technique to use. We report four cases of successful ear replantation, review the various techniques that have been used successfully, and provide treatment recommendations for future consideration.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006534-199706000-00008

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microsurgical replantation requires longer operative time and hospital stay, multiple blood transfusions, and has a significant failure rate.

    “Microsurgical replantation has some disadvantages; it requires longer operative time and hospital stay, multiple blood transfusions, and has a significant failure rate.[4]”

    From Auricular avulsion injuries (2022) · cites this paper as [4]

  • Microsurgical replantation has disadvantages including prolonged operative time, postoperative venous congestion, anemia requiring repeated transfusion, and prolonged patient hospitalization.

    “Furthermore, it has other disadvantages including prolonged operative time, postoperative venous congestion, anemia requiring repeated transfusion, and prolonged patient hospitalization.”

    From Auricular avulsion injuries (2022) · cites this paper as [4]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Van Beek, 1988, Ann Plast Surg, 21, 178

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Kind, G. M., Buncke, G. M., Placik, O. J., Jansen, D. A., DʼAmore, T., & Buncke, H. J.
ORCID
Buncke, Gregory M.
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
1997-06
Volume
99
Issue
7
Pages
1858-1867
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/00006534-199706000-00008
OpenAlex
W2078004847
Cited by
63
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
ear replantation, microsurgical revascularization, vein grafting, superficial temporal vessels, ear amputation
MeSH terms
Adult, Amputation, Traumatic, Anastomosis, Surgical, Clinical Protocols, Ear Diseases, Ear, External, Edema, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Ischemia, Male, Microsurgery, Middle Aged, Replantation, Surgical Flaps, Temporal Muscle, Thrombosis, Tissue Survival, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Veins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review