The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological Sequelae of Cancer Diagnosis: A Meta-analytical Review of 58 Studies after 1980
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In a review of the literature from 1980 to 1994 on psychological and psychiatric problems in patients with cancer, the prevalence, severity, and the course of these problems (i.e., depression, anxiety, and general psychological distress) were studied with the help of meta-analyses and qualitative analyses. Apart from this, qualitative analyses were also applied with respect to other relevant variables. METHOD: A literature search in MEDLINE was conducted and cross-references of articles identified via MEDLINE. Meta-analysis was applied when possible. RESULTS: There seemed to be a wide variation across studies in psychological and psychiatric problems. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences between cancer patients and the normal population with respect to anxiety and psychological distress. However, cancer patients seemed to be significantly more depressed than normals. Compared with psychiatric patients, cancer patients were significantly less depressed, anxious, or distressed. Compared with a sample of other medical patients, cancer patients showed significantly less anxiety. With respect to course, a significant decrease was found in the meta-analysis for anxiety, but not for depression. Further meta-analyses showed significant differences among groups of cancer patients with regard to tumor site, sex, age, design of the study, and year of publication. From the qualitative analyses, it seemed that medical, sociodemographic, and psychological variables were related inconsistently to psychological and psychiatric problems. CONCLUSION: With the exception of depression, the amount of psychological and psychiatric problems in patients with cancer does not differ from the normal population. The amount of psychological and psychiatric problems is significantly less in cancer patients than in psychiatric patients. The amount of anxiety is significantly less in cancer patients than in other groups of medical patients with mixed diagnoses, whereas depression is not. Future studies should aim at exploring possible causes for the sometimes impressive differences in psychological or psychiatric problems among patients with cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
The assessment of anxiety states by rating
HAMILTON, M. (1959) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x · Cited by 11,455
The brief symptom inventory: an introductory report.
Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700048017 · Cited by 6,650
Robins, L. N. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001 · Cited by 5,219
Szer, J. (1999) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb127745.x · Cited by 3,353
The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations.
Veit, C. T., & Ware, J. E. (1983) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.51.5.730 · Cited by 1,967
The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among cancer patients
Derogatis, L. R. (1983) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03330300035030 · Cited by 1,575
The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis.
Suls, J. M., & Fletcher, B. (1985) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.4.3.249 · Cited by 1,225
A standardized psychiatric interview for use in community surveys.
Goldberg, D. P., Cooper, B., Eastwood, M. R., Kedward, H. B., & Shepherd, M. (1970) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.24.1.18 · Cited by 805
Cited by
Mitchell, A. J., Chan, M., Bhatti, H., Halton, M., Grassi, L., Johansen, C., & Meader, N. (2011) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70002-x · Cited by 2,449
Prevalence of depression in patients with cancer
Massie, M. J. (2004) · Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs · doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh014 · Cited by 1,408
Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: Prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age
Linden, W., Vodermaier, A., MacKenzie, R., & Greig, D. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.025 · Cited by 1,245
Self-management interventions for chronic illness
Newman, S., Steed, L., & Mulligan, K. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17277-2 · Cited by 992
Depression as a predictor of disease progression and mortality in cancer patients: A Meta‐Analysis
Satin, J. R., Linden, W., & Phillips, M. J. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24561 · Cited by 972
Metadata
- Authors
- van't Spijker, A., Trijsburg, R. W., & Duivenvoorden, H. J.
- Venue
- Psychosomatic Medicine
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 280-293
- ISSN
- 0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083320232
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological Sequelae of Cancer Diagnosis: A Meta-analytical Review of 58 Studies after 1980. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006842-199705000-00011
- The paper
- van't Spijker, A., Trijsburg, R. W., & Duivenvoorden, H. J. (1997). Psychological Sequelae of Cancer Diagnosis: A Meta-analytical Review of 58 Studies after 1980. Psychosomatic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199705000-00011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.