Cited by 71Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentSex work and related issuesReproductive tract infections research

New approaches to syphilis control. Finding opportunities for syphilis treatment and congenital syphilis prevention in a women’s correctional setting.

BLANK, SUSAN, McDONNELL, DIANA D., RUBIN, STEVEN R., NEAL, JAMES J., BROME, MARGARET W., MASTERSON, MARY B., GREENSPAN, JOEL R.·1997·Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With prostitution and drugs the most common reasons for arrest among New York City (NYC) women, female arrestees are at high risk for acquiring syphilis and delivering congenitally infected babies. Despite routine syphilis screening of all NYC inmates, many are released before the need for treatment is recognized, and once released, few could be found for treatment. GOALS: To improve syphilis treatment rates among female correctional inmates in NYC. STUDY DESIGN: At a women's correctional health clinic, on-site, rapid, qualitative nontreponemal syphilis testing (STAT rapid plasma reagin [RPR]) and on-line access to the local syphilis case registry were introduced to supplement the usual admission medical evaluation. Treatment decisions made using the authors' jail protocol were compared with treatment criteria used in NYC's sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics. Patients consisted of a consecutive sample of 685 remandees admitted one or more times during the day shift, March 24, 1993, to July 31, 1993, who had a full complement of mandatory admission medical tests. Using the study protocol, syphilis treatment decisions were made and needed treatment was furnished at the end of the admission medical evaluation. The main outcome measures were correct identification and treatment of syphilis in this population, compared with standard NYC Department of Health (DOH) STD clinic practice, as well as the effect of the jail protocol on pregnancy outcomes and need to treat offspring for congenital syphilis. RESULTS: Compared with NYC DOH STD clinic practice, the study protocol was 95% sensitive and 88% specific in arriving at appropriate treatment for syphilis. Treatment at the end of the admission medical evaluation increased syphilis treatment rates from 7% to 84% of women with indications for treatment and to 88% of pregnant women with indications for treatment. Prospective follow-up for birth outcomes revealed no spontaneous abortions and eight live births. Seven of the eight did not need congenital syphilis treatment because their mothers were adequately treated while incarcerated. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative (or STAT) RPR testing and access to DOH syphilis case registry data provide prompt and accurate diagnostic information that can lead to an overall increase in the number of inmates appropriately treated (with a minimum amoung of overtreatment) in a women's correctional facility. This protocol may be applicable in other high-risk, transient populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007435-199704000-00006

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Detection and treatment of early syphilis in correctional facilities might affect rates of transmission among adults and prevention of congenital syphilis.

    “Detection and treatment of early syphilis in correctional facilities might affect rates of transmission among adults and prevention of congenital syphilis (377).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [377]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BLANK, S., McDONNELL, D. D., RUBIN, S. R., NEAL, J. J., BROME, M. W., MASTERSON, M. B., & GREENSPAN, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (US)
Corresponding author
  • BLANK, SUSAN
  • RUBIN, STEVEN R.
  • BROME, MARGARET W.
  • GREENSPAN, JOEL R.
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
1997-04
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
218-226
ISSN
0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029247292
Cited by
71
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sex work and related issues
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
syphilis, pregnant women, congenital syphilis, birth outcomes, STI screening, New York City
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Clinical Protocols, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Mass Screening, New York City, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Pregnancy Outcome, Prisons, Registries, Sensitivity and Specificity, Syphilis, Women's Health, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review