New approaches to syphilis control. Finding opportunities for syphilis treatment and congenital syphilis prevention in a women’s correctional setting.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With prostitution and drugs the most common reasons for arrest among New York City (NYC) women, female arrestees are at high risk for acquiring syphilis and delivering congenitally infected babies. Despite routine syphilis screening of all NYC inmates, many are released before the need for treatment is recognized, and once released, few could be found for treatment. GOALS: To improve syphilis treatment rates among female correctional inmates in NYC. STUDY DESIGN: At a women's correctional health clinic, on-site, rapid, qualitative nontreponemal syphilis testing (STAT rapid plasma reagin [RPR]) and on-line access to the local syphilis case registry were introduced to supplement the usual admission medical evaluation. Treatment decisions made using the authors' jail protocol were compared with treatment criteria used in NYC's sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics. Patients consisted of a consecutive sample of 685 remandees admitted one or more times during the day shift, March 24, 1993, to July 31, 1993, who had a full complement of mandatory admission medical tests. Using the study protocol, syphilis treatment decisions were made and needed treatment was furnished at the end of the admission medical evaluation. The main outcome measures were correct identification and treatment of syphilis in this population, compared with standard NYC Department of Health (DOH) STD clinic practice, as well as the effect of the jail protocol on pregnancy outcomes and need to treat offspring for congenital syphilis. RESULTS: Compared with NYC DOH STD clinic practice, the study protocol was 95% sensitive and 88% specific in arriving at appropriate treatment for syphilis. Treatment at the end of the admission medical evaluation increased syphilis treatment rates from 7% to 84% of women with indications for treatment and to 88% of pregnant women with indications for treatment. Prospective follow-up for birth outcomes revealed no spontaneous abortions and eight live births. Seven of the eight did not need congenital syphilis treatment because their mothers were adequately treated while incarcerated. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative (or STAT) RPR testing and access to DOH syphilis case registry data provide prompt and accurate diagnostic information that can lead to an overall increase in the number of inmates appropriately treated (with a minimum amoung of overtreatment) in a women's correctional facility. This protocol may be applicable in other high-risk, transient populations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Detection and treatment of early syphilis in correctional facilities might affect rates of transmission among adults and prevention of congenital syphilis.
“Detection and treatment of early syphilis in correctional facilities might affect rates of transmission among adults and prevention of congenital syphilis (377).”
From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [377]
Cites
Correctional Health Care: A Public Health Opportunity
Glaser, J. B., & Greifinger, R. B. (1993) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-118-2-199301150-00010 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Risk factors for syphilis: cocaine use and prostitution.
Rolfs, R. T., Goldberg, M., & Sharrar, R. G. (1990) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.80.7.853 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Greenberg, M. S., Singh, T., Htoo, M., et al. (1991) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.81.10.1316 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Epidemiology of cervical cancer
Moghissi, K. S., & Mack, H. C. (1968) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(15)33386-x · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Selective mass treatment in a venereal disease control program.
Jaffe, H. W., Rice, D., Voigt, R., Fowler, J., & John, R. K. S. (1979) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.69.11.1181 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
The potential role of custody facilities in controlling sexually transmitted diseases.
Cohen, D. A., Scribner, R. A., Clark, J., et al. (1992) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.82.4.552 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
The Syphilis Epidemic in Connecticut
Farley, T. A., Hadler, J. L., & Gunn, R. A. (1990) · Sexually Transmitted Diseases · doi:10.1097/00007435-199010000-00003 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
High Prevalence of Syphilis Detected Through a Jail Screening Program
Heimberger, T. S. (1993) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1993.00410150083008 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
de Lissovoy, G., Zenilman, J. M., Nelson, K., et al. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Webber, M. P., & Hauser, W. A. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021
Workowski, K. A., Bachmann, L. H., Chan, P. A., Johnston, C. M., Muzny, C. A., Park, I., Reno, H., Zenilman, J. M., & Bolan, G. A. (2021) · MMWR. Recommendations and Reports · doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1 · Cited by 2,759 · see citing works
Treatment of syphilis in pregnancy and prevention of congenital syphilis.
Wendel Jr., G. D., Sheffield, J. S., Hollier, L. M., Hill, J. B., Ramsey, P. S., & Sánchez, P. J. (2002) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/342108 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Kouyoumdjian, F. G., Leto, D., John, S., Henein, H., & Bondy, S. (2012) · International Journal of STD & AIDS · doi:10.1258/ijsa.2011.011194 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Biswas, H. H., Chew Ng, R. A., Murray, E. L., Chow, J. M., Stoltey, J. E., Watt, J. P., & Bauer, H. M. (2018) · Sexually Transmitted Diseases · doi:10.1097/olq.0000000000000782 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Congenital Syphilis Prevention: Strategies, Evidence, and Future Directions
Plotzker, R. E., Murphy, R. D., & Stoltey, J. E. (2018) · Sexually Transmitted Diseases · doi:10.1097/olq.0000000000000846 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Owusu-Edusei, K., Gift, T. L., Chesson, H. W., & Kent, C. K. (2013) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kws240 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- BLANK, S., McDONNELL, D. D., RUBIN, S. R., NEAL, J. J., BROME, M. W., MASTERSON, M. B., & GREENSPAN, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (US)
- Corresponding author
- BLANK, SUSAN
- RUBIN, STEVEN R.
- BROME, MARGARET W.
- GREENSPAN, JOEL R.
- Venue
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 218-226
- ISSN
- 0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029247292
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sex work and related issues
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- syphilis, pregnant women, congenital syphilis, birth outcomes, STI screening, New York City
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Clinical Protocols, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Mass Screening, New York City, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Pregnancy Outcome, Prisons, Registries, Sensitivity and Specificity, Syphilis, Women's Health, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review