The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Single human leukocyte antigen flow cytometry beads for accurate identification of human leukocyte antigen antibody specificities
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is difficult to assign antibody specificity for highly sensitized patients using a cell panel with multiple antigens per reaction. We describe here a single antigen bead panel for accurate identification of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody specificities by flow cytometry. METHODS: A total of 110 single recombinant HLAs, including 34 A locus alleles, 57 B locus alleles, and 19 C locus alleles, were produced by a mammalian expression system. These single antigens were coated onto eight different colored microbeads, which were mixed together in one tube for simultaneous detection of HLA antibodies against eight different antigens per flow cytometry test. RESULTS: Single HLA reacted specifically with the serologically defined monoclonal antibodies. The single antigen panel provided higher resolution than the regular cell panel for antibody detection by uncovering the masked specificities. Single antigens also provided higher sensitivity than the multiple antigens coated onto beads for HLA antibody detection as demonstrated by serum dilution studies. In 10 sera from patients who had rejected a kidney transplant, single antigen beads identified antibodies to 31 of 35 antigens that were mismatched in the donor. Most important, none of the reactions were against antigens present in the recipient. CONCLUSION: An accurate and sensitive HLA antibody detection method is described using flow cytometry beads coated with single HLAs produced by recombinant technology. The single antigen beads should be useful in predicting negative crossmatch in highly sensitized organ recipients and highly sensitized patients requiring platelets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tait, B. D., Süsal, C., Gebel, H. M., Nickerson, P. W., Zachary, A. A., Claas, F. H. J., Reed, E. F., Bray, R. A., Campbell, P., Chapman, J. R., et al. (2013) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0b013e31827a19cc · Cited by 787
Lachmann, N., Terasaki, P. I., Budde, K., Liefeldt, L., Kahl, A., Reinke, P., Pratschke, J., Rudolph, B., Schmidt, D., Salama, A., et al. (2009) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0b013e3181a44206 · Cited by 344
Self-citationEffector Mechanisms of Rejection
Moreau, A., Varey, E., Anegon, I., & Cuturi, M.-C. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a015461 · Cited by 189
Sun, Y., Florio, T. J., Gupta, S., Young, M. C., Marshall, Q. F., Garfinkle, S. E., Papadaki, G. F., Truong, H. V., Mycek, E., Li, P., et al. (2023) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.adj5792 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Pei, R., Lee, J.-H., Shih, N.-J., Chen, M., & Terasaki, P. I.
- Venue
- Transplantation
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-49
- ISSN
- 0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070076886
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single human leukocyte antigen flow cytometry beads for accurate identification of human leukocyte antigen antibody specificities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007890-200301150-00008
- The paper
- Pei, R., Lee, J.-H., Shih, N.-J., Chen, M., & Terasaki, P. I. (2003). Single human leukocyte antigen flow cytometry beads for accurate identification of human leukocyte antigen antibody specificities. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200301150-00008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.