Community-based Participatory Research: An Approach to Intervention Research With a Native American Community
Open accessAbstract
Community-based participatory research (CBPR), with its emphasis on joining with the community as full and equal partners in all phases of the research process, makes it an appealing model for research with vulnerable populations. However, the CBPR approach is not without special challenges relating to ethical, cultural, and scientific issues. In this article, we describe how we managed the challenges we encountered while conducting a CBPR project with a Native American community. We also suggest criteria that will enable evaluation of the project.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CBPR is considered a best practice when engaging in research with Indigenous, marginalized, and oppressed populations.
“Thus, CBPR has been adopted and is considered a best practice when engaging in research with Indigenous, marginalized, and oppressed populations (Dadich et al., 2019; Holkup et al., 2004; Lewis & Boyd, 2013; Stanton, 2014).”
From Indigenous Elder-centered methodology: research that decolonizes and indigenizes (2023) · cites this paper as Holkup et al., 2004
Cites
REVIEW OF COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 · Cited by 5,893 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Donovan (2015) · American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research · doi:10.5820/aian.2201.2015.42 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Rasmus, S. M. (2014) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-014-9653-3 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Porche, M. V., Folk, J. B., Tolou-Shams, M., & Fortuna, L. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.867460 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Whitesell, N. R., Sarche, M., Keane, E., Mousseau, A. C., & Kaufman, C. E. (2018) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1098214017726872 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Pekmezaris, R., Williams, M. S., Pascarelli, B., Finuf, K. D., Harris, Y. T., Myers, A. K., Taylor, T., Kline, M., Patel, V. H., Murray, L. M., et al. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01346-0 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Indigenous Elder-centered methodology: research that decolonizes and indigenizes
Crouch (Deg Hit’an, C., Kim, S. M., Asquith-Heinz, Z., Decker, E., Andrew (Yup’ik, I., Lewis (Aleut), J. P., & Rosich, R. M. (2023) · AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples · doi:10.1177/11771801231155437 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“…process strengthens community and researcher relationships resulting in trust, bidirectional opportunities for learning and building strengths, appropriate methods for disseminating findings, and emphasizing long-term commitment of all involved parties (Holkup et al., 2004; Woodbury et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMcEachern, L. W., Yessis, J., Zupko, B., Yovanovich, J., Valaitis, R., & Hanning, R. M. (2022) · Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/apnm-2021-0776 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
McEachern, L. W., Yessis, J., Yovanovich, J., Crack, S., Zupko, B., Valaitis, R., & Hanning, R. M. (2022) · Current Developments in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzac090 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
McEachern, L. W., Harris, S., Valaitis, R., Watson, A., Yessis, J., Zupko, B., & Hanning, R. M. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315878 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Taliep, N., Bulbulia, S., Lazarus, S., Seedat, M., & Building Bridges Team (2022) · The Palgrave Handbook of Innovative Community and Clinical Psychologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71190-0_24 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Indigenous Methodologies in International Research on Indigenous Family and Community Engagement
Washington, S. A., Johnson, L., & Mendoza Chui, K. (2025) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543241279565 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Holkup, P. A., Tripp-Reimer, T., Salois, E. M., & Weinert, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- ORCID
- Weinert, Clarann
- Venue
- Advances in Nursing Science
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 162-175
- ISSN
- 0161-9268 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2774214
- OpenAlex
- W2084603631
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Advances in Nursing Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa) (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Nursing Research (1P20NR07790-01, R21NR008528, P30NR003979, P20NR007790, R03NR009282)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Keywords
- community-based participatory research, Native American tribes, vulnerable populations, research ethics, research collaboration, project evaluation criteria, nursing research
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Anthropology, Cultural, Community Participation, Elder Abuse, Humans, Indians, North American, United States, Program Evaluation, Nursing Research, Ethics, Research, Vulnerable Populations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
