Cited by 37Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceCultural Competency in Health Care

Advancing Scientific Methods in Community and Cultural Context to Promote Health Equity: Lessons From Intervention Outcomes Research With American Indian and Alaska Native Communities

Open access
Whitesell, Nancy Rumbaugh, Sarche, Michelle, Keane, Ellen, Mousseau, Alicia C., Kaufman, Carol E.·2018·American Journal of Evaluation

Abstract

Evidence-based interventions hold promise for reducing gaps in health equity across diverse populations, but evidence about effectiveness within these populations lags behind the mainstream, often leaving opportunities to fulfill this promise unrealized. Mismatch between standard intervention outcomes research methods and the cultural and community contexts of populations at greatest risk presents additional challenges in designing and implementing rigorous studies; these challenges too often impede efforts to generate needed evidence. We draw on experiences with American Indian and Alaska Native communities to illustrate how consideration of culture and context can constructively shape intervention research and improve the quality of evidence produced. Case examples from a partnership with one American Indian community highlight opportunities for increasing alignment in intervention development, research design, and study implementation to maximize both validity and feasibility. We suggest that responsively tailoring intervention outcomes research to cultural and community contexts is fundamental to supporting health equity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1098214017726872

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Adams DW (1995). Education for extinction: American Indians and the board school experience, 1875–1928. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
  2. Bess J. (2000). “Kill the Indian and Save the Man!” Charles Eastman surveys his past. Wicazo Sa Review, 15(1), 7– 28.
  3. McCarthy RJ (2011). The Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Federal trust obligation to American Indians. Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law, 19(1), 1– 160.
  4. Merjian AH (2010). An unbroken chain of injustice: The Dawes Act, Native American Trusts, and Cobell v. Salazar. Gonzaga Law Review, 46, 609– 660.
  5. Sarche M, Novins DK, & Belcourt-Dittloff A. (2010). Engaged scholarship with tribal communities In Fitzgerald H, Burack C, & Seifer S. (Eds.), Handbook of Engaged Scholarship: Contemporary Landscapes, Future Directions (Vol. 1, pp. 215– 228). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
  6. Schnarch B. (2004). Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 80– 95.
  7. U.S. Census Bureau. (1994). American Indian and Alaska Native areas Geographic areas reference manual (pp. 5.1– 5.16). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitesell, N. R., Sarche, M., Keane, E., Mousseau, A. C., & Kaufman, C. E.
Affiliations
Colorado School of Public Health (US)
Corresponding author
Whitesell, Nancy Rumbaugh
Venue
American Journal of Evaluation
Published
2017-09-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
42-57
ISSN
  • 1098-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0878
OpenAlex
W2752979103
Cited by
37
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Evaluation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R01PH000027)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH069086)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA035111, R01DA027665)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
health equity, American Indian and Alaska Native communities, culturally tailored interventions, community context, evidence-based interventions, community partnerships, health disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review