Cited by 297Healthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

The hostile environment of the intensive care unit

Donchin, Yoel, Seagull, F. Jacob·2002·Current Opinion in Critical Care

Abstract

Intensive care units (ICUs) were developed for patients with special needs and include an array of technology to support medical care. However, basic lessons in ergonomics, human factors, and human performance fail to propagate in this complex medical environment. Complicated, error-prone devices are commonly used. There are too many patient data for one person to process effectively. Lighting, ambient noise, and scheduling all result in provider and patient stress. These difficult working conditions make errors more probable and are risk factors for provider burnout and negative outcomes for patients. Auditory alarms on ICU equipment, ICU syndrome, and needle sticks are discussed as examples of such problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00075198-200208000-00008

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donchin, Y., & Seagull, F. J.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Donchin, Yoel
Venue
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Published
2002-08
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
316-320
ISSN
1070-5295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033877969
Cited by
297
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
ICU environment, human factors, medical device errors, provider burnout, ICU syndrome, auditory alerts, needlestick injuries, patient stress, background noise, lighting, work scheduling, patient safety
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Critical Care, Health Facility Environment, Hospital Design and Construction, Humans, Ergonomics, Inpatients, Intensive Care Units, Monitoring, Physiologic, Personnel, Hospital, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Workplace, Medical Errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review