Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phytoestrogens for Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms: A Systematic Review

Krebs, Erin E., Ensrud, Kristine E., MacDonald, Roderick, Wilt, Timothy J.·2004·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of phytoestrogens for treatment of menopausal symptoms. DATA SOURCES: We searched the Cochrane Library and MEDLINE from 1966 to March 2004, using a detailed list of terms related to phytoestrogens and menopausal symptoms and also hand-searched abstracts from relevant meetings. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Randomized trials were eligible if they involved symptomatic perimenopausal or postmenopausal women, compared phytoestrogen with placebo or control, reported hot flush frequency or menopausal symptom scores, and were at least 4 weeks in duration. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Data were extracted onto standardized forms using a prospectively developed protocol. Twenty-five trials involving 2,348 participants met criteria. At baseline, the mean age was 53.1 years, mean duration of menopause was 4.3 years, and mean daily hot flush frequency was 7.1. Mean study duration was 17 weeks. Trials were grouped into categories according to type of phytoestrogen: soy foods, beverages, or powders (n = 11); soy extracts (n = 9); and red clover extracts (n = 5). Of the 8 soy food trials reporting hot flush frequency outcomes, 7 were negative. Five trials of soy foods provided information to calculate effect sizes; these were in the small-to-medium range, favoring placebo in 3 trials and soy in 2. Of the 5 soy extract trials reporting hot flush frequency, 3 (including the 2 largest trials) were negative. Effect sizes were calculated for 2 soy extract trials: one favored placebo with small effect size and the other favored soy with moderate effect size. Red clover trials showed no improvement in hot flush frequency (weighted mean difference -0.60, 95% confidence interval -1.71 to 0.51). Adverse effects were primarily gastrointestinal and taste intolerance in the soy food and beverage trials. CONCLUSION: The available evidence suggests that phytoestrogens available as soy foods, soy extracts, and red clover extracts do not improve hot flushes or other menopausal symptoms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.aog.0000140688.71638.d3

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Krebs, E. E., Ensrud, K. E., MacDonald, R., & Wilt, T. J.
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2004-10
Volume
104
Issue
4
Pages
824-836
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134372734
Cited by
273
References
5
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytoestrogens for Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000140688.71638.d3
The paper
Krebs, E. E., Ensrud, K. E., MacDonald, R., & Wilt, T. J. (2004). Phytoestrogens for Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms: A Systematic Review. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000140688.71638.d3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.