Cited by 162Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchPhysical Activity and Health

Is urinary incontinence a barrier to exercise in women

Nygaard, Ingrid, Girts, Tammy, Fultz, Nancy H., Kinchen, Kraig, Pohl, Gerhardt, Sternfeld, Barbara·2005·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of urinary incontinence during exercise in women, estimate whether exercise intensity is related to leakage severity, and report women's assessments of incontinence as a barrier to exercise. METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to 5,130 women aged 18-60 years drawn from National Family Opinion research panels. Physical activity levels were assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Urinary incontinence, defined as involuntary leakage in the last 30 days, was assessed with the Sandvik Severity Index and a global measure of bother. Prevalence estimates were adjusted via post-stratification weighting. RESULTS: A total of 3,364 eligible women responded (68%), of whom 34.6% were insufficiently active (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.7-36.5%), 29.7% were sufficiently active (95% CI 27.9-31.5%), and 35.7% were highly active (95% CI 33.8-37.6%). Urinary incontinence prevalence was 34.3% (95% CI 32.5-36.1%). One in seven women experienced urinary leakage during physical activity; this was more common among highly active (15.9%) than less active women (11.8%) (P = .01). After adjusting for age, comorbidities, education, and race, women with very severe incontinence were 2.64 times (95% CI 1.25-5.55) more likely to be insufficiently active than continent women. Incontinence was a moderate or substantial barrier to exercise for 9.8% (95% CI 8.8-10.9%) of women. Of incontinent women, the proportion for whom incontinence was a moderate or substantial barrier to exercise increased with each severity category: 9.2%, slight; 37.8%, moderate; 64.6%, severe; and 85.3%, very severe (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Urinary incontinence is perceived as a barrier to exercise, particularly by women with more severe leakage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.aog.0000168455.39156.0f

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nygaard, I., Girts, T., Fultz, N. H., Kinchen, K., Pohl, G., & Sternfeld, B.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2005-08
Volume
106
Issue
2
Pages
307-314
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2334168932
Cited by
162
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dkgest of the World Latest Medical Information
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7k24hd042469-05)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K24 HD042469-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
urinary incontinence, barriers to exercise, physical activity, women, incontinence severity, physical activity level, prevalence, exercise motivation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Urinary Incontinence, Exercise, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review