Cited by 276Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and EducationBehavioral Health and Interventions

Barriers to regular exercise among adults at high risk or diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review

Open access
Korkiakangas, E. E., Alahuhta, M. A., Laitinen, J. H.·2009·Health Promotion International

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to identify the reported barriers to regular exercise among adults either at high risk or already diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2D), because of the importance of exercise in the prevention of T2D. We searched the MEDLINE, Cinahl and PsycINFO databases. All potentially relevant articles were reviewed by two researchers, and 67 titles were found, of which 13 papers met inclusion criteria. Internal and external barriers to exercise were identified among adults either at high risk of T2D or already diagnosed. Internal barriers were factors which were influenced by the individual's own decision-making, and external barriers included factors which were outside of the individual's own control. It is important for counselling to identify the internal and external barriers to regular exercise. In this way, the content of counselling can be developed, and solutions to the barriers can be discussed and identified. Further research on the barriers to regular exercise is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapro/dap031

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exercise adherence is notoriously low among free-living individuals with obesity or type 2 diabetes, particularly when interventions are unsupervised or not integrated into clinical support systems.

    “Exercise adherence is notoriously low among free-living individuals with obesity or type 2 diabetes, particularly when interventions are unsupervised or not integrated into clinical support systems [213–215].”

    From Effects of Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy on Fat Mass and Glucose Homeostasis in Humans and Animals: A Narrative Review with Systematic Literature Search (2025) · cites this paper as [213]

    The Introduction describes sedentary adults as a concern, and the Discussion identifies barriers to regular exercise among adults at high risk of or diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, including feeling too overweight to exercise. The Discussion also recommends individualized exercise counselling. However, the review does not establish that adherence is particularly low in free-living people when interventions are unsupervised or outside clinical support systems. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individuals with type 2 diabetes and comorbid obesity often cite discomfort as a barrier to exercise.

    “However, individuals with T2D with comorbid obesity often cite discomfort as a barrier to exercise (Korkiakangas 2009), and similar findings have been reported in regard to diet modulation (Tomiyama 2010).”

    From Mindfulness-based interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (2021) · cites this paper as Korkiakangas 2009

    The review’s Table 3 (Discussion, p. 423) lists feeling uncomfortable, physical discomfort, and feeling too overweight to exercise as barriers among adults at high risk for or diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. It does not establish how often discomfort is cited specifically by people who have both diagnosed diabetes and obesity. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lack of time is often cited as a barrier to being physically active.

    “'Lack of time' is often cited as a barrier to being physically active (Korkiakangas et al. 2009;Reichert et al. 2007)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korkiakangas, E. E., Alahuhta, M. A., & Laitinen, J. H.
Affiliations
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
Corresponding author
Korkiakangas, E. E.
Venue
Health Promotion International
Published
2009-09-30
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
416-427
ISSN
  • 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2245
OpenAlex
W2113043745
Cited by
276
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Promotion International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Finland (118176)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
barriers to exercise, type 2 diabetes, diabetes prevention, physical activity, internal barriers, external barriers, physical activity counseling
MeSH terms
Culture, Decision Making, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Motivation, Time Factors, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review