Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Behavior of Stage II-IV Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary

Gershenson, David M., Sun, Charlotte C., Lu, Karen H., Coleman, Robert L., Sood, Anil K., Malpica, Anais, Deavers, Michael T., Silva, Elvio G., Bodurka, Diane C.·2006·Obstetrics & Gynecology
DOI 10.1097/01.aog.0000227787.24587.d1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical behavior of patients with stage II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary seen at our institution who underwent primary surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with stage II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary from 1978 to 2003 were identified using existing databases. Clinicopathologic information was obtained from medical records. Progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier. The log-rank test was used to compare differences between survival curves. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: We identified 112 eligible patients. Median age was 43 years.; 90% had stage III disease. Preoperative serum CA 125 was elevated in 86% of patients. The most common sites of extraovarian disease were omentum, fallopian tubes, pelvic peritoneum, and uterus. Response rate to platinum-based chemotherapy in 10 evaluable patients (15% of patients with gross residual disease) was 80%, and 42 patients underwent second-look surgery: microscopically negative findings, 2 (5%); microscopically positive disease, 13 (33%); macroscopically positive disease, 24 (62%); and insufficient information, 3 (7%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 19.5 and 81.8 months. Persistent disease after primary chemotherapy was the only factor associated with shorter overall survival time (hazard ratio 3.46, 95% confidence interval 2.00-5.97, P<.001). CONCLUSION: Metastatic low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary is characterized by young age at diagnosis and prolonged overall survival. Segregating women with this diagnosis in future clinical trials is warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.aog.0000227787.24587.d1

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Gershenson, D. M., Sun, C. C., Lu, K. H., Coleman, R. L., Sood, A. K., Malpica, A., Deavers, M. T., Silva, E. G., & Bodurka, D. C.
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2006-08
Volume
108
Issue
2
Pages
361-368
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/01.aog.0000227787.24587.d1
OpenAlex
W1967450348
Cited by
290
References
30
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Behavior of Stage II-IV Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000227787.24587.d1
The paper
Gershenson, D. M., Sun, C. C., Lu, K. H., Coleman, R. L., Sood, A. K., Malpica, A., Deavers, M. T., Silva, E. G., & Bodurka, D. C. (2006). Clinical Behavior of Stage II-IV Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000227787.24587.d1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.