The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gestational Weight Gain and Adverse Neonatal Outcome Among Term Infants
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, high pre-pregnancy BMI and EGWG are associated with many unfavorable maternal and neonatal outcomes [180,181,182,183].”
From A Comprehensive Review on Social Inequalities and Pregnancy Outcome—Identification of Relevant Pathways and Mechanisms (2022) · cites this paper as [182]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants
McIntire, D. D., Bloom, S. L., Casey, B. M., & Leveno, K. J. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199904223401603 · Cited by 1,258
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Taffel, 1986, Vital Health Stat 21, 44, 1
- Parker, 1992, Obstet Gynecol, 79, 664
- Abrams, 1986, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 154, 503, 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90591-0 · DOI
- Minior, 1998, Obstet Gynecol, 92, 57, 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00118-5 · DOI
- Doctor, 2001, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 185, 652, 10.1067/mob.2001.116749 · DOI
- Boulet, 2003, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 188, 1372, 10.1067/mob.2003.302 · DOI
- Jolly, 2003, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 111, 9, 10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00154-4 · DOI
- Stotland, 2004, Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 87, 220, 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.08.010 · DOI
- Orskou, 2003, Obstet Gynecol, 102, 115, 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00402-2 · DOI
- Naeye, 1979, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 135, 3, 10.1016/S0002-9378(79)80008-3 · DOI
- Deruelle, 2004, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, 32, 398, 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2004.02.018 · DOI
- Curzik, 2002, Acta Med Croatica, 56, 31
- Martin, 2003, Natl Vital Stat Rep, 52, 1
- Pang, 2002, Obstet Gynecol, 100, 253, 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02074-4 · DOI
- Stotland, 2004, Obstet Gynecol, 104, 671, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000139515.97799.f6 · DOI
- Gunderson, 2000, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 24, 1660, 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801456 · DOI
- Siega-Riz, 1996, J Nutr, 126, 146, 10.1093/jn/126.1.146 · DOI
- Abrams, 1989, Obstet Gynecol, 74, 577
- Carmichael, 1997, Obstet Gynecol, 89, 865, 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00047-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Rowland, 1990, Am J Clin Nutr, 52, 1125, 10.1093/ajcn/52.6.1125 · DOI · Paper page
- Stevens-Simon, 1992, J Am Diet Assoc, 92, 85, 10.1016/S0002-8223(21)00569-1 · DOI
- Cedergren, 2004, Obstet Gynecol, 103, 219, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000107291.46159.00 · DOI
- Feig, 1998, Lancet, 351, 1054, 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)06261-2 · DOI
Cited by
Siega-Riz, A. M., Viswanathan, M., Moos, M.-K., Deierlein, A., Mumford, S., Knaack, J., Thieda, P., Lux, L. J., & Lohr, K. N. (2009) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.002 · Cited by 708
Kominiarek, M. A., & Peaceman, A. M. (2017) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.040 · Cited by 421
Maternal Prepregnancy Body Mass Index and Gestational Weight Gain on Pregnancy Outcomes
Li, N., Liu, E., Guo, J., Pan, L., Li, B., Wang, P., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Liu, G., Baccarelli, A. A., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082310 · Cited by 356
Marques, A. H., Bjørke-Monsen, A.-L., Teixeira, A. L., & Silverman, M. N. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.051 · Cited by 166
Liu, Y., Dai, W., Dai, X., & Li, Z. (2012) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2403-6 · Cited by 148
Liu, L., Hong, Z., & Zhang, L. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep12863 · Cited by 94
Simoncic, V., Deguen, S., Enaux, C., Vandentorren, S., & Kihal-Talantikite, W. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192416592 · Cited by 83
Ferrari, N., Mallmann, P., Brockmeier, K., Strüder, H. K., & Graf, C. (2014) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-228 · Cited by 43
Blackwell, S. C., Landon, M. B., Mele, L., Reddy, U. M., Casey, B. M., Wapner, R. J., Varner, M. W., Rouse, D. J., Thorp, J. M., Sciscione, A., et al. (2016) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000001773 · Cited by 33
MEHTA, S. H. (2008) · Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/grf.0b013e31816fda53 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Stotland, N. E., Cheng, Y. W., Hopkins, L. M., & Caughey, A. B.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3, Part 1
- Pages
- 635-643
- ISSN
- 0029-7844
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
