The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biofilms and Antimicrobial Resistance
Abstract
The pathogenesis of many orthopaedic infections is related to the presence of microorganisms in biofilms. I examine the emerging understanding of the mechanisms of biofilm-associated antimicrobial resistance. Biofilm-associated resistance to antimicrobial agents begins at the attachment phase and increases as the biofilm ages. A variety of reasons for the increased antimicrobial resistance of microorganisms in biofilms have been postulated and investigated. Although bacteria in biofilms are surrounded by an extracellular matrix that might physically restrict the diffusion of antimicrobial agents, this does not seem to be a predominant mechanism of biofilm-associated antimicrobial resistance. Nutrient and oxygen depletion within the biofilm cause some bacteria to enter a nongrowing (ie, stationary) state, in which they are less susceptible to growth-dependent antimicrobial killing. A subpopulation of bacteria might differentiate into a phenotypically resistant state. Finally, some organisms in biofilms have been shown to express biofilm-specific antimicrobial resistance genes that are not required for biofilm formation. Overall, the mechanism of biofilm-associated antimicrobial resistance seems to be multifactorial and may vary from organism to organism. Techniques that address biofilm susceptibility testing to antimicrobial agents may be necessary before antimicrobial regimens for orthopaedic prosthetic device-associated infections can be appropriately defined in research and clinical settings. Finally, a variety of approaches are being defined to overcome biofilm-associated antimicrobial resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A component of innate immunity prevents bacterial biofilm development
Singh, P. K., Parsek, M. R., Greenberg, E. P., & Welsh, M. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/417552a · Cited by 1,026
Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation
Drenkard, E., & Ausubel, F. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416740a · Cited by 997
Ramage, G. (2002) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkf049 · Cited by 468
Effect of Growth Rate on Resistance of Candida albicans Biofilms to Antifungal Agents
Baillie, G. S., & Douglas, L. J. (1998) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.42.8.1900 · Cited by 234
Cited by
Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life
Flemming, H.-C., Wingender, J., Szewzyk, U., Steinberg, P., Rice, S. A., & Kjelleberg, S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94 · Cited by 5,979
agr-Mediated Dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms
Boles, B. R., & Horswill, A. R. (2008) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000052 · Cited by 963
Innate and Induced Resistance Mechanisms of Bacterial Biofilms
Anderson, G. G., & O'Toole, G. A. (2008) · Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75418-3_5 · Cited by 438
Flemming, H.-C. (2016) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms4040041 · Cited by 374
Borges, A., Abreu, A., Dias, C., Saavedra, M., Borges, F., & Simões, M. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21070877 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Patel, R.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- &NA;
- Issue
- 437
- Pages
- 41-47
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033406469
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofilms and Antimicrobial Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.blo.0000175714.68624.74
- The paper
- Patel, R. (2005). Biofilms and Antimicrobial Resistance. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000175714.68624.74
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.