The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Iliac Crest Bone Graft Donor Site Pain After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Patient Satisfaction Outcome Assessment
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Autogenous iliac crest bone is the gold-standard graft for spinal fusion surgery. Unfortunately, there is a frequent incidence of graft site pain that persists well into the postoperative period with complication rates reported in 2.8-39% of patients. Persistent pain lasting at least 2 years is reported in 15-39% of patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to determine the incidence of acute and persistent pain as well as patient assessment of graft site appearance following iliac crest bone graft harvest for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). The control arms of four randomized prospective multicenter clinical trials evaluating recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft were combined. Two hundred eight patients underwent iliac crest bone graft harvest for ALIF in threaded cylindrical cages or threaded bone dowels. Patients were assessed at each postoperative visit with questionnaires evaluating graft site pain intensity, duration, and appearance. METHODS: Two hundred eight patients underwent iliac crest bone graft harvest for ALIF as the control group of four randomized prospective multicenter clinical trials evaluating rhBMP-2 versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft in threaded cylindrical cages or threaded bone dowels. Most patients in the control group had anterior iliac crest graft harvest, equally from the right and left side. Three grafts (1.4%) were taken from the posterior crest and six (2.9%) were tricortical. Follow-up was obtained at hospital discharge, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. A pain evaluation score was made up of two Visual Analog Scales: one scale measuring intensity, the other frequency of pain. For the intensity scale, a rating of "0" meant no pain and "10" was "as bad as it could be." For the frequency scale, a rating of "0" meant pain was present "none of the time" and "10" meant it was present "all the time." Combining these scales, a total score of 20 indicated the worst pain was present all the time. Patients were also questioned about the graft site appearance. RESULTS: Two hundred eight patients underwent iliac crest harvest, and prospective data were available on 202 patients. At hospital discharge, 2 patients (1%) had no pain; this increased to 34 of 199 (17%) at 6 weeks postoperatively and to 85 of 199 patients (43%) at 3 months. However, 41% of patients reported pain at 6 months postoperatively (79/192), and 33% of 168 reported pain at 1 year. One hundred forty-one of 208 patients completed a survey at 24 months, with 31% reporting some level of pain. At hospital discharge, the graft site pain score ranged from 0 to 20 with a mean of 12.8, decreasing to 7.3 at 6 weeks, to 3.8 at 3 months, and to 2.9, 2.4, and 1.8 at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. At all time intervals, P values from t tests comparing the mean with 0 were <0.001. Graft site appearance at discharge was good in 49% of patients, fair in 40%, and poor in 11%. At 6 weeks, appearance was good in 69%, fair in 27%, and poor in 5%; at 3 months, it was good in 75%, fair in 24%, and poor in 2%; at 6 months, it was good in 82%, fair in 15%, and poor in 3%; at 12 months, it was good in 82% and fair or poor in 19%; and at 24 months, it was good in 84% and fair or poor in 16%. There was no significant difference between posterior and anterior harvest sites or bicortical grafts, and all were included in the analysis. Right or left side demonstrated no differences. DISCUSSION: This is the first study known to the authors presenting results of prospective data collected in a multicenter study evaluating iliac crest harvest site pain, both intensity and frequency, as well as graft site appearance. The results demonstrate that 31% of patients had persistent pain at 24 months postoperatively and 16% reported fair or poor appearance of their graft site. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent donor site pain remains a problem with harvest of autogenous iliac crest bone graft for spinal fusion. This prospective study, the first such study reported for ALIF, confirms that donor site pain remains a significant postoperative management problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods
Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Braver, S. (1986) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9 · Cited by 3,275
Complications of Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvesting
Arrington, E. D., Smith, W. J., Chambers, H. G., Bucknell, A. L., & Davino, N. A. (1996) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-199608000-00037 · Cited by 1,547
Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvest Donor Site Morbidity: A Statistical Evaluation
Banwart, J. C., Asher, M. A., & Hassanein, R. S. (1995) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199505000-00012 · Cited by 1,274
Autogenous Iliac Crest Bone Graft: Complications and Functional Assessment
Goulet, J. A., Senunas, L. E., DeSilva, G. L., & Greenfield, M. L. V. H. (1997) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-199706000-00011 · Cited by 909
AHLMANN, E., PATZAKIS, M., ROIDIS, N., SHEPHERD, L., & HOLTOM, P. (2002) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200205000-00003 · Cited by 663
Fernyhough, J. C., Schimandle, J. J., Weigel, M. C., Edwards, C. C., & Levine, A. M. (1992) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199212000-00006 · Cited by 461
Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales.
Scott, J., & Huskisson, E. C. (1979) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.38.6.560 · Cited by 427
HUSKISSON, E. C. (1982) · PubMed · Cited by 395
Sawin, P. D., Traynelis, V. C., & Menezes, A. H. (1998) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1998.88.2.0255 · Cited by 373
Persistent Iliac Crest Donor Site Pain: Independent Outcome Assessment
Heary, R. F., Schlenk, R. P., Sacchieri, T. A., Barone, D., & Brotea, C. (2002) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1097/00006123-200203000-00015 · Cited by 268
Cited by
FDA-approved bone grafts and bone graft substitute devices in bone regeneration
Gillman, C. E., & Jayasuriya, A. C. (2021) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2021.112466 · Cited by 417
Effects of protein dose and delivery system on BMP-mediated bone regeneration
Boerckel, J. D., Kolambkar, Y. M., Dupont, K. M., Uhrig, B. A., Phelps, E. A., Stevens, H. Y., García, A. J., & Guldberg, R. E. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.063 · Cited by 323
Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) for fracture healing in adults
Garrison, K. R., Shemilt, I., Donell, S., Ryder, J. J., Mugford, M., Harvey, I., Song, F., & Alt, V. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006950.pub2 · Cited by 278
Cell delivery therapeutics for musculoskeletal regeneration☆
Nöth, U., Rackwitz, L., Steinert, A. F., & Tuan, R. S. (2010) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2010.04.004 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Sasso, R. C., LeHuec, J. C., & Shaffrey, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- Supplement 1
- Pages
- S77-S81
- ISSN
- 1536-0652 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968450106
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iliac Crest Bone Graft Donor Site Pain After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Patient Satisfaction Outcome Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.bsd.0000112045.36255.83
- The paper
- Sasso, R. C., LeHuec, J. C., & Shaffrey, C. (2005). Iliac Crest Bone Graft Donor Site Pain After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Patient Satisfaction Outcome Assessment. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000112045.36255.83
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.