The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy and safety of the monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody F(ab′)2 fragment afelimomab in patients with severe sepsis and elevated interleukin-6 levels*
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether administration of afelimomab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor F(ab')2 monoclonal antibody fragment, would reduce 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with severe sepsis and elevated serum levels of IL-6. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-center, phase III clinical trial. SETTING: One hundred fifty-seven intensive care units in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Subjects were 2,634 patients with severe sepsis secondary to documented infection, of whom 998 had elevated interleukin-6 levels. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were stratified into two groups by means of a rapid qualitative interleukin-6 test kit designed to identify patients with serum interleukin-6 levels above (test positive) or below (test negative) approximately 1000 pg/mL. Of the 2,634 patients, 998 were stratified into the test-positive group, 1,636 into the test-negative group. They were then randomly assigned 1:1 to receive afelimomab 1 mg/kg or placebo for 3 days and were followed for 28 days. The a priori population for efficacy analysis was the group of patients with elevated baseline interleukin-6 levels as defined by a positive rapid interleukin-6 test result. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the group of patients with elevated interleukin-6 levels, the mortality rate was 243 of 510 (47.6%) in the placebo group and 213 of 488 (43.6%) in the afelimomab group. Using a logistic regression analysis, treatment with afelimomab was associated with an adjusted reduction in the risk of death of 5.8% (p = .041) and a corresponding reduction of relative risk of death of 11.9%. Mortality rates for the placebo and afelimomab groups in the interleukin-6 test negative population were 234 of 819 (28.6%) and 208 of 817 (25.5%), respectively. In the overall population of interleukin-6 test positive and negative patients, the placebo and afelimomab mortality rates were 477 of 1,329 (35.9%)and 421 of 1,305 (32.2%), respectively. Afelimomab resulted in a significant reduction in tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6 levels and a more rapid improvement in organ failure scores compared with placebo. The safety profile of afelimomab was similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Afelimomab is safe, biologically active, and well tolerated in patients with severe sepsis, reduces 28-day all-cause mortality, and attenuates the severity of organ dysfunction in patients with elevated interleukin-6 levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vincent, J. L., Moreno, R., Takala, J., Willatts, S., De Mendonça, A., Bruining, H., Reinhart, C. K., Suter, P. M., & Thijs, L. G. (1996) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf01709751 · Cited by 11,674
Le Gall, J.-R. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.270.24.2957 · Cited by 7,773
Shock and Tissue Injury Induced by Recombinant Human Cachectin
Tracey, K. J., Beutler, B., Lowry, S. F., Merryweather, J., Wolpe, S., Milsark, I. W., Hariri, R. J., Fahey, T. J., Zentella, A., Albert, J. D., et al. (1986) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3764421 · Cited by 2,549
Detection of circulating tumor necrosis factor after endotoxin administration
Michie, H. R., Manogue, K. R., Spriggs, D. R., Revhaug, A., O'Dwyer, S., Dinarello, C. A., Cerami, A., Wolff, S. M., & Wilmore, D. W. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198806093182301 · Cited by 1,677
Treating Patients with Severe Sepsis
Wheeler, A. P., & Bernard, G. R. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901213400307 · Cited by 992
Cited by
Pierrakos, C., & Vincent, J.-L. (2010) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc8872 · Cited by 1,377
Sepsis: pathophysiology and clinical management
Gotts, J. E., & Matthay, M. A. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i1585 · Cited by 1,243
van der Poll, T., Shankar-Hari, M., & Wiersinga, W. J. (2021) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.10.012 · Cited by 1,010
Advances in the understanding and treatment of sepsis-induced immunosuppression
Venet, F., & Monneret, G. (2018) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/nrneph.2017.165 · Cited by 981
Why have clinical trials in sepsis failed?
Marshall, J. C. (2014) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2014.01.007 · Cited by 805
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Panacek, E. A., Marshall, J. C., Albertson, T. E., Johnson, D. H., Johnson, S., MacArthur, R. D., Miller, M., Barchuk, W. T., Fischkoff, S., Kaul, M., Teoh, L., Van Meter, L., Daum, L., Lemeshow, S., Hicklin, G., & Doig, C.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2173-2182
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104010066
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and safety of the monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody F(ab′)2 fragment afelimomab in patients with severe sepsis and elevated interleukin-6 levels*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000145229.59014.6c
- The paper
- Panacek, E. A., Marshall, J. C., Albertson, T. E., Johnson, D. H., Johnson, S., MacArthur, R. D., Miller, M., Barchuk, W. T., Fischkoff, S., Kaul, M., Teoh, L., Van Meter, L., Daum, L., Lemeshow, S., Hicklin, G., & Doig, C. (2004). Efficacy and safety of the monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody F(ab′)2 fragment afelimomab in patients with severe sepsis and elevated interleukin-6 levels*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000145229.59014.6c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.