Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of delirium on the survival of mechanically ventilated patients*

Lin, Shu-Min, Liu, Chien-Ying, Wang, Chun-Hua, Lin, Horng-Chyuan, Huang, Chien-Da, Huang, Pei-Yao, Fang, Yueh-Fu, Shieh, Meng-Heng, Kuo, Han-Pin·2004·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To revalidate a means of assessing delirium in intensive care unit patients and to investigate the independent effect of delirium on the mortality of mechanically ventilated patients. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: A 37-bed medical intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Subjects were 102 of 131 consecutive mechanically ventilated patients. MEASUREMENTS: All the enrolled patients were assessed for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Mortality rate were compared between patients with or without delirium, and the predictors of death were investigated. RESULTS: The two CAM-ICU assessors' sensitivities in diagnosing delirium compared with reference standard were 91% and 95%, whereas their specificities were both 98%. They also demonstrated high interrater reliability with kappa statistics of 0.91. Delirium was present in 22 of 102 (22%) patients in the first 5 days. The delirious patients had higher intensive care unit mortality rate than nondelirious patients (63.6% vs. 32.5%, respectively), with a hazard ratio of 2.57 (95% confidence interval, 1.56-8.15). In multivariate analysis, delirium (odds ratio, 13.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.69-62.91), shock (odds ratio, 12.91; 95% confidence interval, 2.93-56.92), and illness severity (odds ratio, 9.61; 95% confidence interval, 2.24-41.18) were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms previous work showing that delirium is an independent predictor for increased mortality among mechanically ventilated patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000145587.16421.bb

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Lin, S.-M., Liu, C.-Y., Wang, C.-H., Lin, H.-C., Huang, C.-D., Huang, P.-Y., Fang, Y.-F., Shieh, M.-H., & Kuo, H.-P.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2004-11
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
2254-2259
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W188497340
Cited by
451
References
29
FWCI
12.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of delirium on the survival of mechanically ventilated patients*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000145587.16421.bb
The paper
Lin, S.-M., Liu, C.-Y., Wang, C.-H., Lin, H.-C., Huang, C.-D., Huang, P.-Y., Fang, Y.-F., Shieh, M.-H., & Kuo, H.-P. (2004). The impact of delirium on the survival of mechanically ventilated patients*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000145587.16421.bb

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.