Cited by 118Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Glucocorticoid therapy in neurologic critical care

Gomes, Joao A., Stevens, Robert D., Lewin, John J., Mirski, Marek A., Bhardwaj, Anish·2005·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pivotal role of inflammation and edema across the spectrum of central nervous system injury has driven extensive investigation into the therapeutic potential of glucocorticoids. OBJECTIVE: To review the experimental and clinical data relating to the efficacy and adverse effects of glucocorticoids in conditions encountered in critical neurologic and neurosurgical illness. DATA SOURCE: Search of MEDLINE and Cochrane databases, manual review of article bibliographies. DATA SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of glucocorticoids is well established in ameliorating edema associated with brain tumors and in improving outcome in subsets of patients with bacterial meningitis. Despite frequently encouraging experimental results, clinical trials of glucocorticoids in ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and traumatic brain injury have not shown a definite therapeutic effect. The evidence supporting glucocorticoid therapy for spinal cord injury is controversial; however methylprednisolone continues to be widely employed in this setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000166389.85273.38

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Widespread use of glucocorticoids in clinical neurology to control CNS inflammation and poststroke edema is often ineffective and can even worsen clinical outcome.

    “While there is widespread use of GCs in clinical neurology to control CNS inflammation in general and poststroke edema in particular, such interventions are often ineffective and can even worsen clinical outcome (Gomes et al., 2005).”

    From The Stressed CNS: When Glucocorticoids Aggravate Inflammation (2009) · cites this paper as Gomes et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gomes, J. A., Stevens, R. D., Lewin, J. J., Mirski, M. A., & Bhardwaj, A.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2005-06
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1214-1224
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073207619
Cited by
118
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS046379, R01NS046379)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
glucocorticoids, cerebral edema, inflammation, brain tumors, bacterial meningitis, ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, methylprednisolone, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Brain Edema, Brain Neoplasms, Central Nervous System Diseases, Central Nervous System Infections, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Myasthenia Gravis, Trauma, Nervous System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review