The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and targeted intensive care on functional outcome after severe head injury*
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: : Intracranial hypertension after severe head injury is associated with case fatality, but there is no sound evidence that monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) and targeted management of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) improve outcome, despite widespread recommendation by experts in the field. The purpose was to determine the effect of ICP/CPP-targeted intensive care on functional outcome and therapy intensity levels after severe head injury. DESIGN: : Retrospective cohort study with prospective assessment of outcome. SETTING: : Two level I trauma centers in The Netherlands from 1996 to 2001. PATIENTS: : Three hundred thirty-three patients who had survived and remained comatose for >24 hrs, from a total of 685 consecutive severely head-injured adults. INTERVENTIONS: : In center A (supportive intensive care), mean arterial pressure was maintained at approximately 90 mm Hg, and therapeutic interventions were based on clinical observations and computed tomography findings. In center B (ICP/CPP-targeted intensive care), management was aimed at maintaining ICP <20 mm Hg and CPP >70 mm Hg. Allocation to either trauma center was solely based on the site of the accident. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: : We measured extended Glasgow Outcome Scale after >/=12 months. Patient characteristics were well balanced between the centers. ICP monitoring was used in zero of 122 (0%) and 142 of 211 (67%) patients in centers A and B, respectively. In-hospital mortality rate was 41 (34%) vs. 69 (33%; p = .87). The odds ratio for a more favorable functional outcome following ICP/CPP-targeted therapy was 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.62-1.44). This result remained after adjustment for potential confounders. Sedatives, vasopressors, mannitol, and barbiturates were much more frequently used in center B (all p < .01). The median number of days on ventilator support in survivors was 5 (25th-75th percentile, 2-9) in center A vs. 12 (7-19) in center B (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: : ICP/CPP-targeted intensive care results in prolonged mechanical ventilation and increased levels of therapy intensity, without evidence for improved outcome in patients who survive beyond 24 hrs following severe head injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WILSON, J. T. L., PETTIGREW, L. E. L., & TEASDALE, G. M. (1998) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.1998.15.573 · Cited by 2,386
Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat.
Altman, D. G. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1309 · Cited by 938
Clinical trials in head injury
Narayan, R. K., Michel, M. E., Ansell, B., Baethmann, A., Biegon, A., Bracken, M. B., Bullock, M. R., Choi, S. C., Clifton, G. L., Contant, C. F., et al. (2002) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/089771502753754037 · Cited by 913 · cited 2×
“Such a trial should be targeted on patients who are most likely to profit from ICP/CPPtargeted therapy (excluding patients with a high likelihood of an extreme outcome) and should use an ordinal outcome measure that is sensitive to changes in the order of magnitude of a potential treatment effect (32).”
Background
Cited by
Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults
Maas, A. I., Stocchetti, N., & Bullock, R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70164-9 · Cited by 2,123
A Trial of Intracranial-Pressure Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury
Chesnut, R. M., Temkin, N., Carney, N., Dikmen, S., Rondina, C., Videtta, W., Petroni, G., Lujan, S., Pridgeon, J., Barber, J., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1207363 · Cited by 1,352
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods—A Review
Raboel, P. H., Bartek, J., Andresen, M., Bellander, B. M., & Romner, B. (2012) · Critical Care Research and Practice · doi:10.1155/2012/950393 · Cited by 416
VI. Indications for Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
Bratton, S. L., Chestnut, R. M., Ghajar, J., McConnell Hammond, F. F., Harris, O. A., Hartl, R., Manley, G. T., Nemecek, A., Newell, D. W., Rosenthal, G., et al. (2007) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2007.9990 · Cited by 405
Critical care management of severe traumatic brain injury in adults
Haddad, S. H., & Arabi, Y. M. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/1757-7241-20-12 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Cremer, O. L., van Dijk, G. W., van Wensen, E., Brekelmans, G. J. F., Moons, K. G. M., Leenen, L. P. H., & Kalkman, C. J.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2207-2213
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147291804
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and targeted intensive care on functional outcome after severe head injury*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000181300.99078.b5
- The paper
- Cremer, O. L., van Dijk, G. W., van Wensen, E., Brekelmans, G. J. F., Moons, K. G. M., Leenen, L. P. H., & Kalkman, C. J. (2005). Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and targeted intensive care on functional outcome after severe head injury*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000181300.99078.b5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.