Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intrapatient Dose Escalation of Anti–CTLA-4 Antibody in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma

Open access
Maker, Ajay V., Yang, James C., Sherry, Richard M., Topalian, Suzanne L., Kammula, Udai S., Royal, Richard E., Hughes, Marybeth, Yellin, Michael J., Haworth, Leah R., Levy, Catherine, Allen, Tamika, Mavroukakis, Sharon A., Attia, Peter, Rosenberg, Steven A.·2006·Journal of Immunotherapy

Abstract

We previously reported our experience in treating 56 patients with metastatic melanoma using a human anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody. Durable tumor regressions were seen that correlated with the induction of autoimmune toxicities. In this study, we treated 46 additional patients using an intrapatient dose escalation schema to test whether higher doses of anti-CTLA-4 antibody would induce increased autoimmunity and concomitant tumor regression. Twenty-three patients started anti-CTLA-4 antibody administration at 3 mg/kg and 23 patients started treatment at 5 mg/kg, receiving doses every 3 weeks. Patients were dose-escalated every other dose to a maximum of 9 mg/kg or until objective clinical responses or grade III/IV autoimmune toxicity were seen. Escalating doses of antibody resulted in proportionally higher plasma concentrations. Sixteen patients (35%) experienced a grade III/IV autoimmune toxicity. Five patients (11%) achieved an objective clinical response. Two of the responses are ongoing at 13 and 16 months, respectively. Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood revealed significant increases in both T-cell surface markers of activation and memory phenotype. Thus, higher serum levels and prolonged administration of anti-CTLA-4 antibody resulted in a trend toward a greater incidence of grade III/IV autoimmune toxicity than previously reported, but did not seem to increase objective response rates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.cji.0000208259.73167.58

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Maker, A. V., Yang, J. C., Sherry, R. M., Topalian, S. L., Kammula, U. S., Royal, R. E., Hughes, M., Yellin, M. J., Haworth, L. R., Levy, C., Allen, T., Mavroukakis, S. A., Attia, P., & Rosenberg, S. A.
Venue
Journal of Immunotherapy
Published
2006-07
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
455-463
ISSN
1524-9557 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145308813
Cited by
265
References
51
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrapatient Dose Escalation of Anti–CTLA-4 Antibody in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.cji.0000208259.73167.58
The paper
Maker, A. V., Yang, J. C., Sherry, R. M., Topalian, S. L., Kammula, U. S., Royal, R. E., Hughes, M., Yellin, M. J., Haworth, L. R., Levy, C., Allen, T., Mavroukakis, S. A., Attia, P., & Rosenberg, S. A. (2006). Intrapatient Dose Escalation of Anti–CTLA-4 Antibody in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma. Journal of Immunotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.cji.0000208259.73167.58

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.