The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fish Intake During Pregnancy and Early Cognitive Development of Offspring
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fish is a source of many nutrients that can be beneficial during pregnancy, as well as a source of neurotoxicant contaminants such as methylmercury. Previous investigations of fish intake in relation to neurodevelopment have focused on possible damage from contaminants, whereas potential benefits of fish consumption have been relatively unexplored METHODS: We evaluated the association between maternal fish intake during pregnancy and offspring's early development of language and communication skills in a cohort of 7421 British children born in 1991-1992. Fish intake by the mother and child was measured by questionnaire. The child's cognitive development was assessed using adaptations of the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory at 15 months of age and the Denver Developmental Screening Test at 18 months of age. Mercury was measured in umbilical cord tissue for a subset of 1054 children RESULTS: Total mercury concentrations were low and were not associated with neurodevelopment. Fish intake by the mother during pregnancy, and by the infant postnatally, was associated with higher mean developmental scores. For example, the adjusted mean MacArthur comprehension score for children whose mothers consumed fish 4 or more times per week was 72 (95% confidence interval = 71-74), compared with 68 (66-71) among those whose mothers did not consume fish. CONCLUSIONS: When fish is not contaminated, moderate fish intake during pregnancy and infancy may benefit development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reproducibility and validity of dietary patterns assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire
Hu, F. B., Rimm, E., Smith-Warner, S. A., Feskanich, D., Stampfer, M. J., Ascherio, A., Sampson, L., & Willett, W. C. (1999) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/69.2.243 · Cited by 1,165
Feldman, H. M., Dollaghan, C. A., Campbell, T. F., Kurs-Lasky, M., Janosky, J. E., & Paradise, J. L. (2000) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00146 · Cited by 364
Cited by
Boyd, A., Golding, J., Macleod, J., Lawlor, D. A., Fraser, A., Henderson, J., Molloy, L., Ness, A., Ring, S., & Davey Smith, G. (2013) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dys064 · Cited by 2,996
Self-citationThe Toxicology of Mercury and Its Chemical Compounds
Clarkson, T. W., & Magos, L. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408440600845619 · Cited by 2,371
Fish Intake, Contaminants, and Human Health: Evaluating the Risks and the Benefits
Mozaffarian, D., & Rimm, E. B. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.15.1885 · Cited by 1,966
Hibbeln, J. R., Davis, J. M., Steer, C., Emmett, P., Rogers, I., Williams, C., & Golding, J. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60277-3 · Cited by 987
Self-citationEvidence on the Human Health Effects of Low-Level Methylmercury Exposure
Karagas, M. R., Choi, A. L., Oken, E., Horvat, M., Schoeny, R., Kamai, E., Cowell, W., Grandjean, P., & Korrick, S. (2012) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1104494 · Cited by 649
Metadata
- Authors
- Daniels, J. L., Longnecker, M. P., Rowland, A. S., & Golding, J.
- Venue
- Epidemiology
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 394-402
- ISSN
- 1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006514892
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fish Intake During Pregnancy and Early Cognitive Development of Offspring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ede.0000129514.46451.ce
- The paper
- Daniels, J. L., Longnecker, M. P., Rowland, A. S., & Golding, J. (2004). Fish Intake During Pregnancy and Early Cognitive Development of Offspring. Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000129514.46451.ce
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.