Cited by 41Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesHormonal Regulation and Hypertension

Hemodynamic and metabolic responses to valsartan and atenolol in obese hypertensive patients

Jordan, Jens, Engeli, Stefan, Boschmann, Michael, Weidinger, Gottfried, Luft, Friedrich C, Sharma, Arya M, Kreuzberg, Ursula·2005·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: None of the current hypertension guidelines provides specific guidance regarding pharmacological management of obese hypertensive patients. Treatment recommendations for lean hypertensives may not be simply extrapolated to obese hypertensive persons. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study with a 13-week treatment period. SETTING: Multicenter study in Germany. PATIENTS: Obese patients with mild to moderate uncomplicated essential hypertension. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with valsartan at a maximal dose of 160 mg/day or with atenolol at a maximal dose of 100 mg/day. Hydrochlorothiazide at doses of 12.5-25 mg was added in patients with blood pressure > 140/90 mmHg on monotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure, lipid and glucose metabolism, and highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were monitored. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were randomized to valsartan and 65 patients to atenolol. With valsartan, systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased from 160.8 +/- 8.9 to 140.5 +/- 13.3 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from 96.1 +/- 7.0 to 85.1 +/- 8.1 mmHg by the end of the study. With atenolol, SBP decreased from 159.3 +/- 6.8 to 139.8 +/- 14.5 mmHg and DBP from 95.0 +/- 6.8 to 83.5 +/- 7.5 mmHg (P = 0.91 for SBP and P = 0.34 for DBP between interventions). Body weight did not change with either treatment. We did not see a significant difference in the response of lipid levels or hsCRP between interventions. To assess the cumulative effect of each intervention on glucose metabolism over the trial duration, we calculated individual areas under the curve for homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) over time. The resulting area under the curve was significantly smaller with valsartan compared with atenolol (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Beta-adrenoreceptor blockers and AT1-receptor blockers, particularly in combination with low-dose diuretics, effectively lower blood pressure in obese hypertensives. However, metabolic responses differ between both treatment strategies, with beneficial effects of AT1-receptor blockers. AT1-receptor blockers are a good choice in obese hypertensives, given the profoundly increased diabetes risk in this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.hjh.0000188734.98463.82

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment with β-blockers leads to metabolic complications including weight gain.

    “Given that excessive sympathetic activity is common in obesity, β-blockers appear as an obvious pharmacologic therapy to treat the hypertension associated with this condition, but treatment with β-blockers leads to metabolic complications including weight gain (16–18).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jordan, J., Engeli, S., Boschmann, M., Weidinger, G., Luft, F. C., Sharma, A. M., & Kreuzberg, U.
Affiliations
  • Helios Kliniken (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Novartis (Germany) (DE)
  • Hamilton General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Jordan, Jens
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2005-12
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
2313-2318
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045285495
Cited by
41
References
21
Citations by year
2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Keywords
valsartan, atenolol, essential hypertension, obesity, blood pressure reduction, insulin resistance, HOMA-IR, glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, C-reactive protein, hydrochlorothiazide, angiotensin receptor blockers, antihypertensive therapy, body weight, low-dose diuretics, metabolic side effects
MeSH terms
Valsartan, Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Adult, Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Atenolol, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hydrochlorothiazide, Hypertension, Lipids, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Tetrazoles, Valine, Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers, Sodium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review